Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 30 October 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 232


AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Victor Marshall
Tanya Maree Devine

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
George Maryon

4:15 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
BCK

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Trial

Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00a.m. 
For Mention
Adrian Raymond Nattey

For Voir Dire
Tye Matthew Curtain

2:15p.m.
For Trial
Tye Matthew Curtain
(Part-Heard)

Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
4:15p.m.
For Discontinuance of Appeal
PFC v State of Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction

Not before 11:30 a.m.

For Decision
Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd
v
Kim David Excell

2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
The Friends’ School Inc
v
Gillian Edmiston

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via Video-link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Coby Wells

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiciton
10:00am For Legal Argument
Nicholas Charles Pitt

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 30 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 232
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 232
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for 30 October 2014 outline several criminal and civil cases scheduled for various courts in Hobart and Launceston. Among the cases, notable criminal proceedings include a part-heard trial of Jamie Peter Smart and Rhys Louis Gardner, and a plea in mitigation and sentence hearing for George Maryon. Additionally, there are civil cases such as Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Kim David Excell, scheduled for decision, and The Friends’ School Inc v Gillian Edmiston, scheduled for hearing in chambers. The lists also include miscellaneous civil business and criminal mentions across different courts and locations.

The legal issues presented in these cases range from criminal trials and pleas to civil disputes involving companies and individuals. The court was tasked with managing the proceedings, ensuring that each case received appropriate attention and that the legal rights of the parties were upheld. The hearings involved a variety of legal arguments, from voir dire examinations to discussions on discontinuance of appeals, reflecting the diverse nature of the cases before the court.

In its reasoning, the court adhered to established legal principles and procedural guidelines to manage the hearings efficiently. The decisions rendered in these cases were based on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and applicable laws. The outcomes of the hearings, including the scheduling of further proceedings and the delivery of judgments, were recorded in the amended law lists, providing clarity and direction for the parties involved.

The final orders and outcomes of these cases were documented in the amended law lists, indicating the status of each proceeding. This included trials that were part-heard, pleas that were accepted or rejected, and decisions that were handed down. The court's decisions were intended to provide resolution to the disputes and ensure that justice was served in accordance with the law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.