Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 21 September 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 2015

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial

Daniel John Oakley
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link
Darrel George Harington
Stephen John Gleeson

For Mention
KR
Hayden Charles Bannister
Tanya Maree Silva

For Bail Consent
SJB

For Directions Hearing
Aaron Leonard Townsend

2:15 p.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Ashton Brian Bresnehan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Angela Maree Leahy
Sally Karen Steers

For Mention
Samuel Alfred Watterson

For Trial
Brodie Leigh Price
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:15 a.m.
For Mention
Tarkine National Coalition Inc.
v
Paul Harriss MHA, Minister for Resources

10:30 a.m.
For Trial

Dale John Hendrex by his Litigation Guardian Marguerite Hendrex
v
Matthew Keating and Lisa Keating
(part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Motion to Review via video link from Launceston
Gregory Charles Williams v Sergeant Gary Lusted

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisidiction
10:00 a.m.
Injunction
Megavar Pty Ltd v Francisco Pontes

LAUNCESTON

COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Christina Vernessa Watson
Linda Lee Jones
Tiffany Louise Shaw
Alexandra Rose Lockwood

To Follow For Trial
Josh Daniel Wilson

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Ashley John Bowley

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Lokendra Singh

Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Motion to Review via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Gregory Charles Williams v Sergeant Gary Lusted

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, dated 21 September 2015, present a variety of matters scheduled for hearings in both Hobart and Launceston. In Hobart, Court 7 is allocated for criminal matters, with trials, mentions, and bail applications spread throughout the day. Among the cases listed, Daniel John Oakley has a trial set for 9:30 a.m., while various mentions and bail consents follow. Meanwhile, Court 8 will handle additional criminal mentions and a part-heard trial. Civil matters are scheduled for Court 1 and Court 2, with a notable case being Tarkine National Coalition Inc. v Paul Harriss MHA, Minister for Resources, set for mention at 10:30 a.m. Further south in Launceston, criminal and civil matters are listed for Court 1 and Court 2, including mentions, trials, and a motion to review.

The legal issues before the court range from criminal trials and bail applications to civil mentions and injunctions. For instance, the court will need to address whether bail should be granted in cases such as Ashton Brian Bresnehan and Angela Maree Leahy, and whether the injunction sought by Megavar Pty Ltd against Francisco Pontes is warranted. Additionally, the court will consider the merits of the mention in Tarkine National Coalition Inc. v Paul Harriss MHA, Minister for Resources and the motion to review in Gregory Charles Williams v Sergeant Gary Lusted. The court's role is to apply the relevant legal principles to the facts of each case to arrive at a just outcome.

In reaching its decisions, the court will consider the evidence presented, applicable statutes, and legal precedents. For criminal cases, the court must ensure that the prosecution proves its case beyond reasonable doubt. In civil matters, the court will weigh the evidence to determine whether a party has met the burden of proof on the balance of probabilities. The court's reasoning will be informed by its interpretation of the law and its application to the specific circumstances of each case. The outcome of these hearings will depend on the strength of the arguments and the evidence provided by the parties involved.

The final orders of the court will reflect its determinations on the issues presented. In criminal cases, this may include decisions on bail, sentencing, or the continuation of a trial. For civil matters, the court may grant or refuse injunctions, review motions, or make determinations on the substantive issues in dispute. The orders will be communicated to the parties involved, and any further appeals or proceedings will follow as necessary.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established