Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 August 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 171


AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 22 AUGUST 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Kai Marley Beyerle
Madeleine Felicity Jessica Brady
Mitchell James Carnes
Daniel Hung Chang Chan
Shi Lin Chan
Tanya Jane Dargaville
Alexander Charles Davidson
Laura Ruth Dunbabin
Bridget Mary Dunne
William Joel Edwards
Madeleine Claire Figg
Caitlin Emily Fitzallen
Rhiannon Sarah Fletcher
David John Gale
Colette Barbara Glazik
Jacqueline Esther Goodwin
Kun Long Joshua Gouw
Lisa Jane Grosser
Alison Victoria Hogg
Kate Debbie Hughes
James John McLeod Hunn
Benjamin David Jones
Theodore Kapodistrias
Samuel James Karpinskyj

3:00 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Lokesh Kashyap
Lisa Ann Kelly
Ellen Sarah Kilpatrick
Graeme John Kirkwood
Belinda Kathleen Klye
Ian Huey Kuek
Tian Cherng Jonathan Lim
Wei Yee Elena Lim
Jenna Maria Madden
Melanie Robyn McCann
Alexander Stuart McKenzie
Rebecca Lindsay Morris
Emma Rae Nichols
Byron MacLean Olivier
Robert Thomas Osler
James Edward Patmore
Sarah Catherine Pearce
Emma Louise Quarmby
Jessie Raj
Clea Frances Ransley
Madeleine Clare Readett
Mardi Louise Rhoden
Cameron Timothy Ritchie
Jessica Ana-Eswary Sabapathy
Elizabeth Jane Saunders

3:45 p.m.

For Admission to the Legal Profession

Kaitlin Maree Saunders
Jessica Elizabeth Sawyer
James Kevin Scheibner
Ross Michael Schreuder
Peter Dominick Vanya Scott
Madeline Kate Sheehan
Teghan Maree Sherwood
Emmeli Josefin Stenlund
Rafael Thomas Osik Szumer
Alexander James Tate
Jackson Hayden Taylor
Christopher Troy Tubbs
Samantha Joy Tucker
Christina Vorillas
Nicholas George Walker
Amy Rose Walsh
Bradley John Walsh
Naomi Lee Allchin
Luke Webb
Esme Wei Har Wong
Cameron James Woodland
Daphne Zhi Yi Yeoh
Teshi Ann Zacharek

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions by Video-Link to Devonport Magistrates Court Conference Room
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner

To Follow
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Michael Thomas Jones

11:00 a.m.
For Sentence
MJK
Nathan Bush

For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m. for Bail Variation by video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street Launceston
Joshua Aaron Wells

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Schult
v
Petan Pty Limited

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00am For Bail Variation by video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Joshua Aaron Wells

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 171
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 171
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This document outlines the amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 22 August 2014, including both civil and criminal jurisdiction cases. The amended lists include cases in Launceston, Hobart, and Burnie. The cases span a range of legal matters, including admission to the legal profession, bail applications, sentencing, and miscellaneous civil business.

The court was required to decide on several legal issues, including the admission of individuals to the legal profession, bail applications and variations, sentencing, and miscellaneous civil business. The admission cases involved the consideration of each individual's qualifications, experience, and character to determine if they were fit and proper persons to be admitted to the legal profession. The bail applications and variations involved the consideration of the circumstances of each case, including the seriousness of the alleged offence, the risk of reoffending, and the risk of interfering with witnesses or the administration of justice. Sentencing involved the consideration of the circumstances of each case, including the nature and circumstances of the offence, the offender's background, and the impact of the offence on the victim and the community. The miscellaneous civil business involved the consideration of a range of legal matters, including contractual disputes, property disputes, and personal injury claims.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific legal issue being considered. In the admission cases, the court considered each individual's qualifications, experience, and character to determine if they were fit and proper persons to be admitted to the legal profession. In the bail applications and variations, the court considered the circumstances of each case to determine if the accused should be granted bail or if their bail conditions should be varied. In the sentencing cases, the court considered the circumstances of each case to determine an appropriate sentence. In the miscellaneous civil business, the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by each party to determine the outcome of the case.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the specific legal issue being considered. In the admission cases, the court admitted or refused to admit each individual to the legal profession. In the bail applications and variations, the court granted or refused bail or varied the conditions of bail. In the sentencing cases, the court imposed a sentence on the offender. In the miscellaneous civil business, the court made a determination on the legal issue being considered.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.