Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 21 November 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leah Lesley Cannon

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ricky John Izard
Rodney McCrae

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Julie Louise Rowbottom
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods

For Disputed Facts
Vance Roy Lobban

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Discovery
Bluett and Ors
v
Fletcher

2:15 p.m.
Injuction
Norris
v
Pedder and Moore

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Joshua Atkinson
Shaun Keverall Kaye
A Witness
Mitchell William Bullen
Anna Michelle Levett
Christina Vernessa Watson

For Directions
Brett Matthew Freeman
Samuel Troy Leslie

For Bail Application
Luke James Reader
Tiffany Louise Shaw

For Plea
Michael Ashley Boxer

For Trial (Part Heard)
Alissa Margaret Moore
Mark Andrew Jenkins

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Adrian John Hall

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Jason Noel Rowe

(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 21 November 2014, outline the schedule of cases set for that day. The cases were primarily criminal in nature, with some civil proceedings also scheduled. The Supreme Court of Tasmania was divided into sessions across Hobart and Launceston. The Hobart sessions included trials and mentions for various defendants, some of whom had already been partially heard. Launceston sessions also featured trials and mentions, as well as bail applications and directions.

The legal issues that arose from these cases involved both criminal and civil matters, including trials, mentions, disputed facts, and injunctions. The Supreme Court was required to manage the proceedings, ensuring that justice was administered appropriately according to the law. For civil matters, the court needed to address issues of discovery and injunctions. In criminal cases, the court had to oversee the trials, mentions, and bail applications, ensuring that the defendants' rights were upheld throughout the legal process.

The reasoning behind the court's scheduling and management of these cases was to ensure that each case received the necessary judicial attention and that the legal process was followed correctly. The court's decisions on the scheduling and handling of these cases were aimed at achieving a fair and efficient administration of justice. The outcome of the day's proceedings would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case.

The final orders of the court would be determined based on the outcomes of the individual cases heard on the day. The court would provide detailed judgments and orders for each case, addressing the specific legal issues and applying the relevant laws to reach a decision.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established