Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 143


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 2 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
PML
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Determination
John Eugene Gay

Court 8, Salamanca Place,
Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1.45 p.m.
For Sentence

Rebecca Janice Maree Cordwell

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12.30 p.m.
Pre Trial Application
Quilliam
v
M & D Thorne Pty Ltd

2.15 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
Rangiawha & Anor
v
Ker & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Ivan James Quarrell
Rebecca Jane Fraser

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceeding Application
JWB

For Plea
Sally Anne Arnold

For Trial
Matthew Julian Foster
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 143
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 143
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 2 August 2013, included several criminal and civil matters. In the Hobart court, cases were scheduled for trial, determination, and sentencing. In Launceston, a trial was also scheduled. In Burnie, preliminary proceedings and trials were on the list. The court lists reflect a mix of criminal and civil cases, with some requiring specific attention such as video link hearings and telephone directions. Each case was assigned to a specific judge or magistrate, indicating the allocation of judicial resources for the day's proceedings.

The legal issues before the court ranged from the determination of criminal cases to the resolution of civil disputes. The cases included preliminary hearings, part-heard trials, and sentencing, indicating a variety of stages in the judicial process. The civil case involving Quilliam v M & D Thorne Pty Ltd required a pre-trial application, highlighting the need for procedural clarification and potential dispute resolution strategies before the trial could proceed. Additionally, the use of video links in some cases suggests logistical considerations in the administration of justice, particularly in regional areas.

The reasoning and outcome of each case were not detailed in the law lists, but the scheduling of specific hearings and trials indicates the court's approach to managing its caseload. The inclusion of various types of hearings, such as directions hearings by telephone and video link hearings, reflects the court's adaptability in handling different types of cases and the importance of efficient case management. The final orders for each case would be determined based on the outcomes of the hearings and trials as they occurred.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.