SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 2 AUGUST 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
PML
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Determination
John Eugene Gay
Court 8, Salamanca Place,
Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1.45 p.m.
For Sentence
Rebecca Janice Maree Cordwell
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
12.30 p.m.
Pre Trial Application
Quilliam
v
M & D Thorne Pty Ltd
2.15 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
Rangiawha & Anor
v
Ker & Anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Ivan James Quarrell
Rebecca Jane Fraser
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceeding Application
JWB
For Plea
Sally Anne Arnold
For Trial
Matthew Julian Foster
(Part-Heard)
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 143
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 143
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from the determination of criminal cases to the resolution of civil disputes. The cases included preliminary hearings, part-heard trials, and sentencing, indicating a variety of stages in the judicial process. The civil case involving Quilliam v M & D Thorne Pty Ltd required a pre-trial application, highlighting the need for procedural clarification and potential dispute resolution strategies before the trial could proceed. Additionally, the use of video links in some cases suggests logistical considerations in the administration of justice, particularly in regional areas.
The reasoning and outcome of each case were not detailed in the law lists, but the scheduling of specific hearings and trials indicates the court's approach to managing its caseload. The inclusion of various types of hearings, such as directions hearings by telephone and video link hearings, reflects the court's adaptability in handling different types of cases and the importance of efficient case management. The final orders for each case would be determined based on the outcomes of the hearings and trials as they occurred.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.