Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 18 March 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 18 MARCH 2016

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (Part Heard)
Samuel William Murray Mulholland

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link
Luke Rogers

For Mention
Nadan Wayne Hall

For Directions Hearing
Benjamin Angus Shield

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tyson Lee Hannah

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Tara Lamont
v
MRD Supermarkets Pty Ltd t/a Triabunna IGA Everyday

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Motor Accidents Insurance Board v Howard Wright

To Follow
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment
Victor John Abblitt and Elizabeth Balindan Abblitt
v
Anti-Discrimination Commissioner

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors

Andrew John McCormack and Ors
v
Lihua Qin and Ors
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:30 a.m. via video link to Risdon Prison
Directions Hearing
The Public Trustee
v
Kenneth Drake

11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Gunns Plantations Limited (In Liquidation)
v
Hilton Paul

12:00 p.m.
Discovery
Joanne Harris
v
Kathryn Butterworth

2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Sharlene Brown and anor
v
Paul De Deuge and ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court
For Mention via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tyson Lee Hannah

To Follow
For Mention
A Witness

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Christopher John Glen Walker

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court
For Judgment via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Motor Accidents Insurance Board v Howard Wright

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a compilation of various legal matters scheduled to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the Magistrates Court, and other associated courts across the state. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is handling several criminal and civil cases, including trials, mentions, directions hearings, and judgments. The Magistrates Court has a single mention listed. The document lists the times, locations, and types of hearings scheduled for each case, providing an overview of the court's workload for the specified date.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide in these cases range from criminal offences to civil disputes. In the criminal cases, defendants face charges such as trial, mention, and directions hearings. The civil cases involve disputes ranging from personal injury claims and motor accident insurance matters to discrimination cases and commercial disputes. The court was tasked with managing these varied legal issues, ensuring that each case received appropriate judicial attention and that the rights of all parties were considered.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were not detailed in the provided document. However, the scheduling of trials, mentions, and hearings indicates that the court was prepared to address each matter in a timely and efficient manner. The inclusion of video-link sessions suggests an effort to accommodate remote participants, possibly due to geographical constraints or other logistical considerations. The outcomes of these hearings would be documented in subsequent court records or judgments.

No final orders were provided in the document, but it can be inferred that the court would issue appropriate rulings based on the evidence and arguments presented during each hearing. The scheduled judgments and mentions indicate that the court was poised to deliver decisions on specific cases, with some judgments to be delivered via video link, highlighting the court's commitment to accessibility and efficiency in its operations.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established