SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 27 JULY 2012
AMENDED LISTS
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT OF APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Judgment
Moira Kathleen Partridge v Hobart City Council and ors
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Application
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Maceui Bona
Scott Brian Enslow
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Madeleine Peta Hookway (by her litigation guardian Tamzin Peta Hookway)
v
Simmons Wolfhagen (a firm)
10.30 a.m.
In Court
For Hearing
Robert Allen Wyatt
v
Attorney General as the representative of the next of kin of Mikolaj Hrydziuszko
3:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Re estate of the late Marnie Maconachie; Peter Royston Worrall - Applicant
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Melissa Jayne Gibbons
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:10am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Dwayne Anthony Bugg
9:15 am
For Mention
JBS
Brett Douglas Scott
Benjamin James Wright
For Bail Consent
Trevor Leo Davern
Adrian Lloyd Reardon
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Guthrie Gene Halfacre
Cyrus Francis Halfarce
For Sentence
Teena Louise Kelly
10:00am
For Plea
Levi Joseph David Hall
Kyle Lockett
For Basha Inquiry
Craig Ronald Jones
For Legal Argument
Tina Louise Jackson
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Lists Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 July 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 139
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 139
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues presented in these cases encompass a range of matters, including disputes over council decisions, professional negligence claims, statutory interpretation, and criminal charges. The court must decide on the validity of the council's actions, the liability of a legal firm, the rights of an individual under specific legislation, and the outcomes of criminal trials. Each case requires the court to interpret relevant laws and apply them to the specific facts presented.
The reasoning and outcome of these cases will depend on the court's interpretation of the evidence and legal principles applicable to each matter. For instance, the court must determine whether the council's actions were lawful and if the legal firm breached any professional standards. It must also consider the statutory provisions relevant to the individual's rights and the admissibility and weight of evidence in criminal trials. The final orders will reflect the court's findings on these issues, potentially resulting in judgments, dismissals, or further proceedings as appropriate.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.