Amended Lists Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 July 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 139


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 27 JULY 2012
AMENDED LISTS

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT OF APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.

For Judgment
Moira Kathleen Partridge v Hobart City Council and ors

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Application
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Maceui Bona
Scott Brian Enslow

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

In Court as in Chambers
For Application

Madeleine Peta Hookway (by her litigation guardian Tamzin Peta Hookway)
v
Simmons Wolfhagen (a firm)

10.30 a.m.
In Court
For Hearing
Robert Allen Wyatt
v
Attorney General as the representative of the next of kin of Mikolaj Hrydziuszko

3:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Re estate of the late Marnie Maconachie; Peter Royston Worrall - Applicant

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent

Criminal Jurisdiction

9.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Melissa Jayne Gibbons

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:10am

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Dwayne Anthony Bugg

9:15 am
For Mention
JBS 
Brett Douglas Scott
Benjamin James Wright

For Bail Consent
Trevor Leo Davern
Adrian Lloyd Reardon

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Guthrie Gene Halfacre
Cyrus Francis Halfarce

For Sentence
Teena Louise Kelly

10:00am
For Plea
Levi Joseph David Hall
Kyle Lockett

For Basha Inquiry
Craig Ronald Jones

For Legal Argument
Tina Louise Jackson

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Lists Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 July 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 139
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 139
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for Friday, 27 July 2012, detail various court proceedings scheduled in Tasmania. In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, multiple cases are set for judgment, application, and hearing. Among these, Moira Kathleen Partridge is scheduled to have a judgment delivered against the Hobart City Council and others. Another case involves an application by Madeleine Peta Hookway, represented by her litigation guardian, against Simmons Wolfhagen. Additionally, Robert Allen Wyatt has an application set against the Attorney General as the representative of the next of kin of Mikolaj Hrydziuszko. In the Launceston court, several criminal cases are listed for trial and mention, including proceedings for Melissa Jayne Gibbons and Dwayne Anthony Bugg.

The legal issues presented in these cases encompass a range of matters, including disputes over council decisions, professional negligence claims, statutory interpretation, and criminal charges. The court must decide on the validity of the council's actions, the liability of a legal firm, the rights of an individual under specific legislation, and the outcomes of criminal trials. Each case requires the court to interpret relevant laws and apply them to the specific facts presented.

The reasoning and outcome of these cases will depend on the court's interpretation of the evidence and legal principles applicable to each matter. For instance, the court must determine whether the council's actions were lawful and if the legal firm breached any professional standards. It must also consider the statutory provisions relevant to the individual's rights and the admissibility and weight of evidence in criminal trials. The final orders will reflect the court's findings on these issues, potentially resulting in judgments, dismissals, or further proceedings as appropriate.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.