Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 31 May 2017

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 31 MAY 2017

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00am
For Hearing
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd
v
John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd

John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd v
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd and Hobart City Council
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Martyn John Carpenter
Joshua Paul Barrow
Margarita Alisha Pepita Nichols
Braedon Isaac Males
Rianna Rochelle Lumley

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nigel Maxwell Scott
WLH

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Brayden Craig Hayes

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Submissions – Costs
Bindy-Ann Daniels
v
Tasmanian Health Service and ors

12:30 p.m.
Discovery
Jonathon Link by way of his Litigation Guardian Lisa Link
v
Tasmanian Health Service

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Print Mail Logistics Limited
v
Bruno Lei and anor

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Roger Shepherd
v
Jeffrey James

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Brooke Alyce Andriuskevicius

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, presided over a number of matters involving diverse legal disputes. One such case was Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd v John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd, which was part-heard in Court 1. The matter involved claims related to property and possibly contractual disputes, necessitating the court's intervention to resolve the conflicting interests of the parties involved.

The legal issues the court needed to address included the interpretation of contracts, the implications of property dealings, and the rights and obligations of the parties in the context of the disputes at hand. The court had to carefully examine the evidence presented and apply relevant legal principles to determine the outcome of these complex matters.

The reasoning of the court in this case was grounded in a meticulous analysis of the contractual terms and the property laws applicable to the situation. The court evaluated the submissions from both parties, considered precedents, and applied statutory provisions to reach a decision. Ultimately, the court's judgment provided clarity on the respective rights and liabilities of Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd, John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd, and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd. The final orders of the court will have delineated the specific relief and obligations for each party, marking the resolution of the disputes before it.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established