Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 31 August 2016

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 31 AUGUST 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Zeb Haas
DS
Peter Bill Zawackyj

For Trial
Curtis Patrick Robert Clay
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Darren Scott Freeman
ZSS

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial
Angela Maree Leahy
(Part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Bowden Kemp

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Garth Leslie Parker as Executor of the Ira Leslie Parker Estate

Tony Edward Parker

Garth Leslie Parker

(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (Part Heard)
Andrew John Bowles v Motor Accidents Insurance Board

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Luke James Reader
Jay Ashley Whatley

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Thomas James Aliano

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Ross Richard Gladwin

4:00pm
For Bail Application
Via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Troy Wylie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania published amended law lists for 31 August 2016, detailing the schedule of cases for that day in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. Various matters were scheduled for mention, plea, trial, and bail applications. In Hobart, Court 7 and Court 8 handled criminal cases, while Court 1 dealt with civil matters. Launceston's Court 2 and Court 1 were assigned to civil and criminal cases, respectively. Burnie's Court 1 was scheduled for a disputed facts hearing and a bail application via video-link.

The legal issues that the court was required to address included the management and disposition of both criminal and civil cases. For criminal cases, this included handling mentions, pleas, and trials, as well as bail applications. In the civil realm, the court was tasked with overseeing trials and part-heard cases, which necessitated the resolution of legal disputes between parties and the application of relevant laws and precedents.

The court followed the scheduled law lists, managing each case according to its designated time and nature. The reasoning and outcomes of each case were not detailed in the published law lists, as they would be specific to the individual matters heard. However, the lists provided a clear framework for the court's proceedings for that day, ensuring that each case was appropriately addressed within the court's jurisdiction. The final orders for each case would have been determined by the judges presiding over the respective hearings, based on the evidence and arguments presented.

No further orders were mentioned in the published law lists. Each case would have been subject to the specific legal requirements and judicial discretion applied during the hearing. The published law lists served as a public record of the court's schedule and provided transparency regarding the court's activities for that day.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established