Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 26 October 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2016

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
For Mention
CGS

For Bail Consent
Mark William Eather

For Directions Hearing
Michelle Lee Arnott
George Joseph Bilinski

For Plea
Yared Ayana Gebreselassie
Joseph Roy Wallner

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jamie Gregory McCrossen
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Brodie Self

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart via Video Link from Court 1, Alexander

Before Justice BRETT

Street, Burnie
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence

James Ernest Davey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Kate Halton
Claire Terry

10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Costs Hearing
Jenny Branch-Allen
v
Barry Easther and Lynn Mason

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial

Meceliza Lisa Perez

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Charles Popowski
BLP
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via Video Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence

James Ernest Davey

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a number of matters were listed for hearing on Wednesday, 26 October 2016, in various locations. This included Launceston, Hobart, and Burnie, with cases being heard both in person and via video link. The court was divided into civil and criminal jurisdictions, with different judges presiding over various hearings. The matters ranged from bail applications, directions hearings, pleas, trials, and sentencing.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved a variety of criminal and civil matters. For example, the court needed to decide whether bail should be granted or refused to certain individuals, whether certain pleas were acceptable, and whether particular sentences were appropriate. Additionally, the court had to consider matters related to admissions to the legal profession and costs hearings.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific matter being heard. For instance, in the case of James Ernest Davey, the court heard a sentence hearing and subsequently passed a sentence. In the case of Mark William Eather, the court heard a directions hearing and provided directions for the matter to proceed. In other cases, such as the admission to the legal profession of Kate Halton and Claire Terry, the court admitted the applicants to practice law.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the outcome of each matter. In some cases, the court granted bail, while in others, it refused bail. Sentences were passed, directions were provided, and admissions to the legal profession were granted. The court's final orders were recorded in the case details and were subject to any appeals that may have been lodged.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established