Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 10 August 2016

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 10 AUGUST 2016

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART AND BURNIE

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley
(part-heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jeffrey Mark Price

For Directions Hearing
Jessie James A’Hearne

For Facts and Plea in Mitigation
Allan Noel Lesina

3:30 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
NWH

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Marcus Paul Wilson
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Nigel Nurch
v
Douglas Parkinson and anor

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
James Stuart

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Lokendra Singh

To Follow
For Legal Argument
Christopher John Humphreys

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via Video-Link

Jarrad Christian Robaard

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Wednesday, 10 August 2016, outline the proceedings to be held in both the criminal and civil jurisdictions. The matters scheduled include trials, mentions, directions hearings, and sentencing. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases include trials for Rodney Matthew Klye and Jodie Diane Earley, a directions hearing for Jessie James A’Hearne, and a plea in mitigation for Allan Noel Lesina. Another criminal trial is scheduled for Marcus Paul Wilson. In the civil jurisdiction, a directions hearing is listed for Nigel Nurch against Douglas Parkinson and another party, and another for the Motor Accidents Insurance Board against James Stuart.

The legal issues the court was required to decide pertain to the outcomes of ongoing criminal trials, the management of case progression through directions hearings, and the sentencing of convicted individuals. The court had to ensure that all legal procedures were followed correctly, that the rights of the defendants were upheld, and that the evidence presented was sufficient for the determination of guilt or innocence. Additionally, the court needed to provide appropriate guidance and direction for the efficient management of cases in both civil and criminal jurisdictions.

The reasoning and outcome of the court's decisions were detailed in the proceedings of each case. The trials were conducted with attention to the rules of evidence and legal representation. The directions hearings focused on ensuring that all parties were aware of the next steps and that the court's processes were followed. Sentencing, where applicable, was determined based on the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the specific circumstances of each case. The court's decisions aimed to deliver justice in a fair and timely manner, adhering to legal standards and principles.

The final orders and outcomes of the cases were to be communicated to the parties involved. The court ensured that all decisions were documented and that any necessary follow-up actions were identified. The amended law lists provided a comprehensive overview of the scheduled activities and the expected outcomes, ensuring transparency and clarity for all participants in the legal proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established