Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 7 August 2018

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 7 AUGUST 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
Eleni Koulmandas

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
AGD

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Thomas Knott
Nicholas Edward Wright

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher John Boland
v
Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal and ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Mention - Renew Writ
Anthony Maxwell Smith
v
Amanda Stanway and ors

10:00 a.m.
Possession
Bendigo Bank and Adelaide Bank Limited
v
Martin Stephen Brain William bowes

Bibiana Rose Devlin
v
Phillip Bryant

10:30 a.m.
Directions/Originating Application
The Law Society of Tasmania
v
Tas Law Pty t/as Avery Keal and anor

Louise Alicia Mollross As Executor of the Estate of the Late Donald Lewis Howard Dyke
v
Patricia Swan

Kenneth Edward Jenkins

Gregory Theodore Gottschalk
v
Property Agents Board

Rebecca Sandra Reid and anor
v
Lynette Ellen Woods

12:00 p.m.
Pre-Trial Conference
David John Tacey and anor
v
Allan Gerry Tacey

R416 Directions Hearing
Gregory Derwent Hunter and ors
v
Janet Emily Chew

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

Anthony Colin Finnegan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.
For Legal Argument
Barry William Evans
Raymond John Pennington

2:15p.m.
For Mention
Vanessa Rae Hardwick

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Susannah Amanda Rowlands

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 7 August 2018, the Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a series of hearings involving both criminal and civil matters. Among the cases listed were trials for Justin Thomas Knott and Nicholas Edward Wright, as well as a part-heard trial for Emma Louise Bishop, Casey Richard Cowen, and Joel Darren Andrew Cowen. Additionally, the court handled civil cases such as Christopher John Boland's appeal against the Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal, and a possession case involving Bendigo Bank and Adelaide Bank Limited against Martin Stephen Brain and William Bowes.

The legal issues presented to the court ranged from criminal charges against individuals, including potential trials and mentions, to civil disputes concerning property management, appeals, and legal profession admissions. The court was tasked with overseeing the procedural aspects of these cases, including the admission of new evidence, directions for trials, and the handling of originating applications. The decisions made by the court in these hearings would set the stage for further legal proceedings in each case.

Justice Wood, Justice Estcourt, and Acting Justice Porter led the criminal trials and mentions, ensuring that the proceedings adhered to legal protocols and that all parties had an opportunity to present their cases. The Chief Justice Blow and Justice Geason managed the civil hearings, focusing on the substantive issues of the disputes and issuing necessary directions or rulings. The court's reasoning was grounded in the applicable laws and legal precedents, with a focus on fairness and adherence to procedural requirements. The outcome of these hearings would determine the next steps in each case, whether it be a continuation of the trial, further pre-trial conferences, or the issuance of court orders.

The final orders made by the court would be detailed in subsequent court records, outlining the decisions reached in each case and any directions issued for further legal actions. These orders would be crucial for the progression of the cases and for ensuring that all parties were aware of their legal standing and obligations.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established