Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 3 November 2020

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 3 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
J S F

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
J L H

For Sentencing Submissions
M S L

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court, 1 Burnie
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

For Sentence
B G M

3:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
K L H

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Robert Peter Matthewson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Brian Graham Dean Gordon

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Nicholas John Barrett

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Aaron Charles McShane

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Shane Michael Emmerton

For Bail Application via video link Risdon Prison Complex
Aaron Pearson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Hearing
Elizabeth Jane Hope as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Lyndsay Hope and ors v George Papoutsakis and ors

For Hearing
Sarah Jane Scattergood v The Commonwealth of Australia

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Louise Mary Schmidtke v Karyn Louise Grueber as Executors of the Will of Joan Louise Smith and anor

For Directions Hearing
Leisha Jean Fuller v Larry Raymond Nunn as executor of the Will of the late Peter John Nunn

2:15pm
For Hearing
Carolyn Iris Clifford v Robert Raymond Clifford

For Hearing via Skype
Bianca Rock v John Soloduch

For Hearing via Skype
Denise Parker v Dr Stephen Wilkinson and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
SDH

For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Robert Peter Matthewson

For Bail Application
Cedric Harper Jordon
Noelene June Jordan

For Plea
Codie Ken Fazackerley

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Katrina Dianne Newitt
Michael Peter Lee James Blake

For Trial
Christopher Brenden Keil

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexandra Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
J L H

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
SDH

The document outlines various cases scheduled to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Launceston, and Burnie on 3 November 2020. The matters range from criminal to civil cases, each assigned to a specific court and time slot. Notable criminal cases include bail applications, sentencing, and directions hearings, often conducted via video link due to COVID-19 protocols. Civil cases involve applications to vary bail, estate disputes, and various other hearings. Each case is assigned to a specific judge or justice and is scheduled to be heard in a designated court room.

The court was required to manage a diverse set of legal issues across both criminal and civil jurisdictions. For criminal cases, key issues included determining appropriate bail conditions, sentencing submissions, and handling directions hearings. In civil cases, issues ranged from varying bail conditions to disputes over estates and wills. The court had to ensure that all hearings were conducted efficiently while adhering to safety protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The court's reasoning involved setting precise schedules to manage the caseload effectively, ensuring that each case was given due attention while maintaining safety protocols. The use of video links facilitated remote participation, reflecting the court's adaptability to current circumstances. The outcome of the scheduling was a structured approach to hearing a diverse array of cases, ensuring that both criminal defendants and civil litigants received timely justice.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the document, but it is expected that the court would proceed with the hearings as scheduled, making decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented in each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established