Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 15 September 2020

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2020

HOBART

In Chambers
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Anthony Paul Gamble and ors
v
Kingborough Council

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Further Submissions
Kraig Anthony Dann v Port Sorell Bowls Club Inc

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
AHJH
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Scott Alfred Robertson

4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Kyle Richard Dupree

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
The Honourable Mr Peter Gutwein, Minister Administering
the State Service Act 2000
v
Tasmanian Industrial Commission

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street,
Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Adrian Michael Berg

For Sentencing Submissions via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Mitchell Thomas Adey

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m.
For Mention (Summary Judgment)
Susan Maree Cochrane Atf Bungaree Trust – 1^st Plaintiff – Allan Titford – 2^nd Plaintiff v Dieter Helbig – 1^st Defendant – Stephen Helbig – 2^nd Defendant

For Directions/Extend Time
David Davenport v Twenty Two Investments Pty Ltd

11:00a.m.
For Possession
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Anthony John Burley and anor

12:00pm
For Directions – Originating Application
Kristy Lee Bourne in her capacity as the Director of Corrective Services v Duc Van Nguyen

3:00p.m.
For Discovery
Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Ltd – 1^st Plaintiff v John Dourias as Trustee of the 60 Barossa Family Trust – 1^st Defendant – Opteon (Tasmania) Pty Ltd – 1^st Third Party- John Dourias – 2^nd Defendant

For Directions – application by letter 10/9/2020
Thomas Peter Wylde-Browne the executor appointed in the will of the deceased William Francis Wylde-Browne

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
Matthew Luke Williams
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JFA
For Facts and Sentence
DIJL
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex
Adrian Michael Berg

For Sentencing Submissions via video link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Mitchell Thomas Adey

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This summary covers the law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Tuesday, 15 September 2020. The cases listed include both civil and criminal matters. In the civil jurisdiction, matters include a telephone directions hearing in a dispute between Anthony Paul Gamble and others against Kingborough Council, further submissions in a case involving Kraig Anthony Dann and the Port Sorrell Bowls Club Inc, and a hearing in a case brought by The Honourable Mr Peter Gutwein, Minister Administering the State Service Act 2000 against the Tasmanian Industrial Commission. In the criminal jurisdiction, there are trials and plea hearings for various defendants, including AHJH, Scott Alfred Robertson, Kyle Richard Dupree, and Adrian Michael Berg. Additionally, there are mentions and sentencing submissions for other defendants via video link from different locations.

The legal issues in these cases are diverse, ranging from disputes over council decisions, contractual obligations, industrial law, and criminal charges. The court was required to consider procedural matters, directions, and evidence in each case. The court's reasoning and outcome would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. The court would need to determine whether to grant or deny requests for directions, extensions of time, summary judgments, and whether to admit or exclude evidence.

The outcome of the cases would be determined based on the merits of the arguments presented by the parties. The court would need to apply relevant laws and legal principles to reach a decision in each case. The final orders would be made by the court after considering the evidence and arguments presented by the parties. The court may grant relief, dismiss claims, or make other orders as it deems appropriate in each case. The specific orders would be outlined in the court's written reasons or judgment.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established