AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 1 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
WLS
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. to follow jury empanelment in Burnie Supreme Court
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Oscar Jyles Dyett
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Kristel Cee-Ann Cowen
For Trial
NRD
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher David Eastley
For Legal Argument
Richard Francis Clarke
Jason Samuel McCormick
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
NHJR
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Dane Ronald Pyke
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. to follow jury empanelment
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Oscar Jyles Dyett
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 394
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 394
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address several legal issues, including the granting of bail, the sentencing of individuals found guilty, and the progression of civil cases. The court also had to consider the part-heard trial involving a plaintiff seeking compensation from the Motor Accidents Insurance Board.
In its reasoning, the court considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case, applying relevant legal principles and statutes. The court granted bail in some instances, denied it in others, and proceeded with trials and sentencing as scheduled. The court also made progress in the part-heard civil trial, indicating the need for further evidence or argument.
The final orders of the court were not detailed in the amended law lists, but it is expected that detailed orders would follow each hearing and argument, addressing the specific issues raised in each case. The court's decisions on bail, sentencing, and the progression of trials and civil cases would have significant implications for the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.