Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 1 May 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 394


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 1 MAY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.

For Trial
WLS
(Part Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. to follow jury empanelment in Burnie Supreme Court
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Oscar Jyles Dyett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Kristel Cee-Ann Cowen

For Trial

NRD     
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Christopher David Eastley

For Legal Argument
Richard Francis Clarke
Jason Samuel McCormick

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board and Anor
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
NHJR

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Dane Ronald Pyke

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. to follow jury empanelment
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Oscar Jyles Dyett

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 1 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 394
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 394
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved multiple parties with various legal issues. The court heard cases related to criminal jurisdiction, bail consent, sentencing, and civil jurisdiction, including a part-heard trial and miscellaneous civil business. The matters were heard by different judges in different locations across Tasmania.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the granting of bail, the sentencing of individuals found guilty, and the progression of civil cases. The court also had to consider the part-heard trial involving a plaintiff seeking compensation from the Motor Accidents Insurance Board.

In its reasoning, the court considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case, applying relevant legal principles and statutes. The court granted bail in some instances, denied it in others, and proceeded with trials and sentencing as scheduled. The court also made progress in the part-heard civil trial, indicating the need for further evidence or argument.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the amended law lists, but it is expected that detailed orders would follow each hearing and argument, addressing the specific issues raised in each case. The court's decisions on bail, sentencing, and the progression of trials and civil cases would have significant implications for the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.