Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 23 November 2017

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 23 NOVEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Stuart Malcolm Allen

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jake Ross Gillie

4:45 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
RWG

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Glenn John McKeown
Sheldon Bruce McCulloch

For Trial
Phillip William Langford
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
John Anthony Curtis

For Directions Hearing
Damien Paul Ford
Benjamin Leigh Higgins
Lloyd Walter Collidge

For Bail Application
Kelly Maree Rhodes
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Lucy Kamara
v
Zahid Akram Khan Sher

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing

Christine Szabo

Luke Moore

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

11:00 a.m.

Amend Proceedings/Strike out Claim

Mujkic Family Company Pty Ltd in its own right and as trustee of the Mujkic Family Trust and ors

Clarke & Gee Pty Ltd t/as Clarke and Gee Lawyers and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:45pm For Directions Hearing via video link
From Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
RWG

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video-link
From Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lucy Kamara v Zahid Akram Khan Sher

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

JDS

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
CB

4:15pm For Bail Application

Tyler Debelin

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania detail a range of criminal and civil cases scheduled for various dates and times in November 2017. The list includes cases before the Court of Criminal Appeal, the Supreme Court, and the Magistrates Court in both Hobart and Launceston. The cases vary in nature, including trials, mentions, bail applications, and directions hearings. Among the notable cases listed are criminal proceedings against individuals such as Stuart Malcolm Allen, Garry Maxwell Billinghurst, and Phillip William Langford, as well as civil disputes including those between Lucy Kamara and Zahid Akram Khan Sher and Mujkic Family Company Pty Ltd against Clarke & Gee Pty Ltd.

The legal issues that the court was required to address span a broad spectrum of criminal and civil law. These include the assessment of evidence and arguments in criminal trials, the determination of bail applications, the direction of proceedings in both criminal and civil cases, and the resolution of specific legal disputes between parties. The court also had to manage the logistics of hearings conducted via video link, ensuring compliance with procedural fairness and the efficient administration of justice.

The court's reasoning and outcome are reflected in the scheduling and conduct of the listed cases. Decisions regarding bail applications, the progression of trials, and the management of civil disputes would have been made in accordance with legal principles and procedural rules. The outcomes of these cases would have been documented in court records and may be subject to further appeal or review depending on the nature and result of the proceedings. The final orders of the court, including judgments, bail decisions, and procedural directions, would have been communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established