Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 1 March 2018

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 1 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Samuel James Eiszele

For Bail Consent
BPJ

4:00 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Andrew Leigh Webb

4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
SWB

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Michael Allen
(Part-Heard)

1:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
WLS

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Travis Anthony Mortyn

Tyron James Page

(Part-Heard)

For Mention

Royden Sydney Bevan Swan

For Bail Consent

MDR

Stephanie Louise Hay

Joel James Lorkin

For Bail Application

Christopher Butt

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review by video link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Sergeant Lauren Cannell
v
Andrew Gray

Andrew Gray
v
Sergeant Lauren Cannell

12:00 p.m.

For Motion to Review by video link
from Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston

Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and Ors
v
Michael John Salter

2:15 p.m.

For Motion to Review by video link
from Court 2, Cameron Street Launceston

Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Constable Michael Bonde

Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:30 a.m.
Amend Proceedings
David Gee and anor
v
Sarah Bolt in her capacity as
Anti-Discrimination Commissioner and anor

2:15 p.m.
Set Aside Judgment
Digga Excavations Pty
v
Linear Capital Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Jannah Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee
of the Jannah Enterprises Pty Ltd Superannuation Fund
v
Shadforth Financial Group Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
Brereton James Jones
Robby Brian Stephens

To Follow
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Luke Anthony Shaw

To Follow
For Mention
A Witness
A Witness

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Nathan Scott Davidson
Benjamin Andrew Stebbeings
Nathan John Jones
Billy Galvin Gordon Riley
Andrew Dickson

To Follow For Bail Consent
DCP

2:15pm For Sentence
Lee Kerry French

Shane Mark Ivey

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Motion to Review by video link
to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Sergeant Lauren Cannell v Andrew Gray
Andrew Gray v Sergeant Lauren Cannell

12:00pm For Motion to Review by video link
to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and Ors v Michael John Salter

2:15pm For Motion to Review by video link
to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Mathew Murray Harrison v Constable Michael Bonde
Mathew Murray Harrison v Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania outline the scheduled cases for Thursday, 1 March 2018, across different courts and jurisdictions in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The Hobart court has several criminal cases scheduled, including bail applications, directions hearings, and trials. Launceston also has a list of criminal and civil cases, some of which are to be reviewed via video link. The Burnie court has no scheduled cases for this day.

The court faced several legal issues, including reviewing bail applications, directions hearings for ongoing trials, and motions to review decisions made by lower courts. Additionally, the court was to consider setting aside a judgment and amending civil proceedings. The legal issues involved the procedural aspects of criminal and civil cases, including the admissibility of evidence, the application of legal principles, and the fairness of the judicial process.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not detailed in the amended law lists. The actual proceedings would have involved detailed arguments and evidence presented by the parties, with the court making rulings based on the law and the facts of each case. The outcomes would have been documented in the court's records and potentially in subsequent legal decisions or appeals. The amended law lists provide a schedule of the cases to be heard but do not include the detailed reasoning or outcomes of the court.

No final orders are stated in the amended law lists. The outcomes of the cases would have been determined during the actual court proceedings and documented in the court's records. The amended law lists serve as a schedule for the court's business on the specified date but do not include the detailed outcomes of each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established