AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 19 FEBRUARY 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Russell John Nowoczynski
(Part Heard)
For Mention
Brendan Lee Jones
Julie Louise Phillips
Corey Matthew Kedey
Robert Michael Allen
A Witness
For Bail Consent
Daiki Ishikawa-Browne
For Facts and Sentence
Paul Hutchinson
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Peter John Ford
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Wayne Gregory Pattison
Joshua Read Blair
Stephanie Louise Hay
Stephen John Williams
For Bail Consent
Jason Samuel McCormick
For Trial
Travis Anthony Mortyn
Tyron James Page
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Public Trustee
v
Stefan Witek and anor
LAUNCESTON (AMENDED)
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Directions Hearing
Christopher Leonard Brewer-Parker
Matthew James Badkin
Cassandra Simpson
10:00am For Mention
Kevin Gregory White
To Follow
For Ruling
Nathan Richard Campbell
To Follow
For Legal Argument
Matthew Luke Williams
2:15pm For Ruling
Nathan Richard Campbell
4:00pm For Mention
Joshua Luke Saunders
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brody Mykel Maisey
For Trial
ASD
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 19 February 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 334
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 334
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues presented in these cases encompass a range of criminal matters, including bail applications, trials, and sentencing. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is tasked with adjudicating on these issues, ensuring that the proceedings adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. The civil case in Launceston involves a hearing before Justice Holt, focusing on the dispute between the Public Trustee and Stefan Witek and another party. The court's role is to interpret relevant laws and apply them to the facts of each case to reach a just outcome.
The court's reasoning and outcome for each case are detailed in the proceedings that took place on the specified dates and times. The decisions reflect the court's interpretation of the evidence presented, the application of legal principles, and the determination of the appropriate legal remedies or penalties. The final orders issued by the court are based on these comprehensive evaluations, ensuring that justice is served according to the law.
In conclusion, the Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania highlight the court's active role in handling both criminal and civil matters across various locations in Tasmania. The court's decisions on these cases demonstrate its commitment to upholding the law and ensuring fair outcomes for all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.