Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 19 February 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 334


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 19 FEBRUARY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Russell John Nowoczynski
(Part Heard)

For Mention
Brendan Lee Jones
Julie Louise Phillips
Corey Matthew Kedey
Robert Michael Allen
A Witness

For Bail Consent
Daiki Ishikawa-Browne

For Facts and Sentence
Paul Hutchinson

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Peter John Ford

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Wayne Gregory Pattison

Joshua Read Blair

Stephanie Louise Hay

Stephen John Williams

For Bail Consent

Jason Samuel McCormick

For Trial

Travis Anthony Mortyn

Tyron James Page

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Public Trustee
v
Stefan Witek and anor

LAUNCESTON (AMENDED)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Directions Hearing
Christopher Leonard Brewer-Parker
Matthew James Badkin
Cassandra Simpson

10:00am For Mention
Kevin Gregory White

To Follow
For Ruling
Nathan Richard Campbell

To Follow
For Legal Argument
Matthew Luke Williams

2:15pm For Ruling
Nathan Richard Campbell

4:00pm For Mention
Joshua Luke Saunders

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brody Mykel Maisey

For Trial
ASD

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 19 February 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 334
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 334
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, dated 19 February 2018, outlines various criminal and civil proceedings scheduled for that day. The cases span different locations within Tasmania, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. In Hobart, Court 7 at Salamanca Place is designated for criminal proceedings, with specific mentions, bail applications, and trials listed. Launceston's Court 1 on Cameron Street also schedules criminal cases, including directions hearings and mentions, while Court 3 at Salamanca Place handles civil matters. Burnie's Court 1 on Alexander Street is set for criminal mentions.

The legal issues presented in these cases encompass a range of criminal matters, including bail applications, trials, and sentencing. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is tasked with adjudicating on these issues, ensuring that the proceedings adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. The civil case in Launceston involves a hearing before Justice Holt, focusing on the dispute between the Public Trustee and Stefan Witek and another party. The court's role is to interpret relevant laws and apply them to the facts of each case to reach a just outcome.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case are detailed in the proceedings that took place on the specified dates and times. The decisions reflect the court's interpretation of the evidence presented, the application of legal principles, and the determination of the appropriate legal remedies or penalties. The final orders issued by the court are based on these comprehensive evaluations, ensuring that justice is served according to the law.

In conclusion, the Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania highlight the court's active role in handling both criminal and civil matters across various locations in Tasmania. The court's decisions on these cases demonstrate its commitment to upholding the law and ensuring fair outcomes for all parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.