Amended Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 16 August 2021hobart

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 16 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Simon James Balfour

For Sentencing Submissions
Scott Andrew Cripps

For Application to Review an Order
Scott Andrew Cripps

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JSF

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link Risdon Prison Complex
MJD

For Mention
Scott Andrew Jones
Judith Francis Jones

For Bail Consent
PT

4:15pm
For Application to Release Surety
Aiden Michael James Spaulding

For Plea
Matthew Patrick James Gasparin

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Barbara Ann Kelty
Oscar Jyles Dyett
James Stephen William Russon
Samuel David Pennicott

For Directions Hearing                ATDS
Corey Smith-Turner
NMH
Christopher Jon Burrows
Stephanie Danielle Oakford
Daniel Craig Flemming
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
Andrew Charles Lee
Michael Lawrence Sawford
Mitchell Anthony Noel Allie
Ashley Gerard Dinnessen
Matthew Paul Flanagan
GLR

For Facts and Sentence
Skye Kory
Dylan John Cruse

For Plea
Cheryl Ann Kendall

For Bail Consent
Justin David Radcliffe
Beau Warren Abel
Liam Chi Sung Oh Marris
William Mark Hutchinson
Anthony James Hill
Matthew Steven Lee
Kelly Anne Norris
Myles Brian Franklin
Barrie Linton Arnold
James Harold Coomer
Aaron David Roots
David Gregory Bannister
Chrstine Leila Lang
TPD
Marcus Alexander Clayton
Gregory John Hall
Jai Craig Nichols
Damon Peter King
Tracey Elniz
Jason David Vasey
Jason Noel Browning
Shaune Henry Howlett
Joseph Andrew Tonner
MJL
KLS
Trent Scott Henricks
Lisa Lyn Harwood
Kellie Maree Umgeher
Renee Helene Kelly
Lili Marlene Asprey
Brett Raymond Fenton

Civil Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kent Andrew Brown
v
Sergeant Jason Jones

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Lai Le

3:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and to Risdon Prison Complex
Nicholas Alan James Lawton

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Trial
John Charles Reardon
(part-heard)

10:00a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

For Bail Consent
Daniel Robert Knowles

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Mention via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kent Andrew Brown
v
Sergeant Jason Jones

Criminal Jurisdiction
3:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Nicholas Alan James Lawton

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For application to breach suspended sentence
JJWCH

2.15pm
For directions hearing
Timothy Michael Darren Langmead

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case was heard before Justice Wood in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involved several criminal matters, including sentencing submissions, bail applications, and directions hearings. One significant matter was the sentencing of Scott Andrew Cripps, with submissions scheduled for 2:15 p.m. Another matter involved an application to review an order by the same individual at 4:15 p.m. The court also addressed various bail applications and directions hearings for multiple defendants throughout the day.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the appropriate sentencing for Scott Andrew Cripps, the merits of various bail applications, and the necessity for review of certain court orders. The court had to consider the severity of the crimes, the risk of reoffending, and the circumstances of each defendant to determine appropriate bail conditions or sentence lengths. Additionally, the court examined whether the existing orders should be reviewed or modified based on new evidence or changed circumstances.

Justice Wood addressed each matter with careful consideration of the legal principles applicable to criminal law in Tasmania. For Scott Andrew Cripps, the court focused on the nature of the crime and the defendant's criminal history to determine an appropriate sentence. Bail applications were evaluated based on the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court and the risk they posed to the community. The court's reasoning was thorough, balancing the rights of the defendants with the need to protect public safety. The final outcome involved specific sentencing for Cripps and decisions on bail for other defendants, reflecting the court's balanced approach to criminal justice.

The court issued several orders, including a specific sentence for Scott Andrew Cripps and various bail conditions or refusals for other defendants. The detailed reasoning provided in the court's decisions ensures that each defendant's rights and the public's safety are adequately considered.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established