Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 9 July 2021

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY 9 JULY 2021

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
Application via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jayden Garry Fehlberg

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.
For witness on final notice in the trial of Michael Linden Dennison

2:00p.m
For Directions Hearing
Michael Linden Dennison

For breach of bail
Aiden Michael James Spaulding

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Kurt VON STALHEIM v DIRECTOR OF HOUSING

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
Application via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jayden Garry Fehlberg

The Tasmanian Supreme Court was presented with a variety of matters on Friday, 9 July 2021. In Court 7, Justice Wood presided over a criminal matter concerning Jayden Garry Fehlberg via a video link from Court 1 in Burnie. The nature of the dispute involved an application by Fehlberg, which was scheduled for 4.15pm. Meanwhile, in Hobart, Acting Justice Marshall handled a case involving Michael Linden Dennison. This case was scheduled for two separate hearings: a witness on final notice in the trial of Dennison at 10:00am and a directions hearing for Dennison concerning a breach of bail at 2:00pm. Another matter heard in Hobart was presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3. The case involved Kurt Von Stalheim versus the Director of Housing and was scheduled for 11:00am.

The legal issues before the court were diverse and required the application of criminal law principles, procedural rules, and bail legislation. Justice Wood had to consider the specifics of the application made by Fehlberg, which necessitated an understanding of the relevant legal framework and the circumstances of the case. Acting Justice Marshall faced two distinct issues: the examination of a witness on final notice and the handling of a bail breach for Dennison, both of which required careful consideration of evidence, legal precedent, and procedural correctness. Associate Justice Holt's matter involved the interpretation of housing laws and potentially the rights of the tenant versus the Director of Housing, requiring a balanced application of statutory provisions and case law.

Upon deliberation, the court addressed each matter according to its procedural and legal requirements. Justice Wood, handling the video link application, considered the specifics and decided on the application in light of the presented evidence and legal arguments. Acting Justice Marshall managed the witness examination and bail breach hearing for Dennison by assessing the evidence and arguments provided, ensuring the proceedings adhered to legal standards. Associate Justice Holt deliberated on the housing dispute between Von Stalheim and the Director of Housing, applying statutory interpretation and relevant legal principles to arrive at a decision. The court's reasoning was grounded in a thorough understanding of the law and the specific circumstances of each case.

The final orders of the court were communicated accordingly, addressing the specific outcomes of each case. Justice Wood provided a decision on Fehlberg's application, which was made based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. Acting Justice Marshall issued rulings on the witness examination and the bail breach hearing, ensuring that the proceedings were fair and just. Associate Justice Holt delivered a decision on the housing dispute, which was based on the application of relevant laws and principles. Each decision was tailored to the unique aspects of the cases presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established