Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 28 February 2020

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
R H K

3:30 p.m
For Bail Application
F N

4:15 p.m
For Application
Janelle Kay Smith
Shannon John Boyer

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Kyle Richard Dupree

For Mention
Duc Van Ngyuen
Jack Bradley Harvey
Steven Craig Murtagh

For Bail Application
Michael Hopkinson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Christopher Richard Stevenson

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Trial
DJB
(Part-heard)

9:30a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Matthew John Cameron

10:00a.m.
For Mention via Video Link
Stephen James Williams

For Directions Hearing
Glenn William Barnard
Neil Craig Berne

2:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
BJHC

For Sentence
JMB
WAR
Harley Luke Sturzaker

Not Before 2:45p.m.
For Bail Application
Rowan Leigh Hume

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Launceston Reception Prison
Heath Michael Kelp

For Directions Hearing
Michael Andrew Smith
Christine Joy Radford

For Plea
Meraki Sharka James Mansell

For Bail Application
Daniel Reginald Clarke
JSS

Not Before 1:00 p.m.
For Special Hearing
ED

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania detail various hearings and applications scheduled for multiple locations across the state. The matters span criminal jurisdiction and include directions hearings, bail applications, and trial mentions. The hearings are set to occur in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, with various judges presiding over different cases. Notable among these cases are bail applications and mentions, along with a part-heard trial.

The court was tasked with addressing several legal issues pertinent to the criminal proceedings listed. These issues include the determination of bail eligibility for applicants, the management of disputed facts in ongoing trials, and the setting of directions for various criminal cases. The court's role involved ensuring that legal procedures were followed and that the rights of both the accused and the prosecution were upheld.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case are not explicitly detailed in the amended law lists, but the scheduled hearings indicate a structured approach to managing the cases. The court aimed to ensure that all legal processes were conducted fairly and efficiently, respecting the rights of all parties involved. The outcomes of individual hearings would depend on the specific circumstances of each case, the evidence presented, and the arguments made by both sides.

The final orders and decisions resulting from these hearings would be communicated to the parties involved and documented in the court's records. These outcomes would reflect the court's interpretation of the law and the facts presented in each case, ensuring that justice is served in accordance with legal standards.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established