AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 25 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Cosmas Paite
For Trial
Glenn Andrew Wakefield
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Risdon Prison Visitors Complex
Michael John Hopkinson
For Sentence
Christopher Kenneth Cook
Desiree Josephine Hunt
For Directions Hearing
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
Zeb Haas
Joel James Lorkin
Casey Therese Howlett
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Ricky Damien Brown
For Bail Consent
LAM
Not before 11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Darren Craig McGuiness
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Grant Andrew Crawford
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Joshua Blair Read
For Trial
DJT
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd
v
Simon John Cooper
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Grant Andrew Crawford
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 25 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 414
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 414
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide included whether the applicants were eligible for bail, whether the sentences imposed on the convicted parties were appropriate, and whether the plaintiff in the civil case was entitled to the relief sought. The court had to consider the evidence presented, the legal principles applicable, and the circumstances of each case in making its decisions. The court's reasoning and outcome for each matter were not detailed in the amended law lists. However, it can be inferred that the court made decisions based on the evidence presented and the applicable law.
The final orders for each matter were not specified in the amended law lists. It is likely that the court provided reasons for its decisions in the written judgments or orders, which may be available upon request or through legal databases. The amended law lists provided an overview of the matters heard by the court on the specified date, but did not provide detailed information about the outcomes or reasons for the court's decisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.