Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 September 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 322


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00p.m.
For Mention
Kellie Maree Umgeher            
Shannon Matthew Pursell

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
PAB

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
JAR

2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
PAB

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 September 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 322
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 322
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of criminal matters in both Hobart and Burnie on Friday, 24 September 2021. In the Hobart court, Kellie Maree Umgeher and Shannon Matthew Pursell were mentioned before Chief Justice Blow. The Burnie court heard matters before Justice Pearce, including a sentencing hearing and a trial. The Burnie court was also connected via video link to the Hobart court for a sentencing submission.

The court was required to decide on the appropriate legal processes and outcomes for the cases mentioned, including the management of the video link for remote participation. The court had to consider the procedural fairness of the hearings, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated the use of video links for remote participation.

The court adhered to established legal protocols to ensure that the hearings were conducted fairly and efficiently. The Chief Justice and Justice Pearce oversaw the proceedings with attention to the specific requirements of each case. The court's reasoning focused on maintaining the integrity of the judicial process while accommodating the necessary health and safety measures. The outcome of the court's decisions was to proceed with the scheduled hearings, ensuring that all parties had the opportunity to participate as required.

The court issued the necessary orders to continue with the mentioned cases, trials, and sentencing submissions. The use of video links was deemed appropriate and sufficient for the purposes of the hearing, allowing for the safe and effective conduct of the court's business.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.