Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 17 March 2017

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 17 MARCH 2017

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Darrel George Harington

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Samuel John Everard
Brett Andrew Imlach
Dale Stephen Russell Howlett

For Trial
Kyle Rix Stephens
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
JAK

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
LR

For Bail Consent
Janaya Kathleen Wilson
Aron Paul Thogersen

For Mention
Duncan Francis Cook

11:30 a.m.
For Plea
Benjamin Lee Noyes

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Jacob Ivan Davis

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Rompa

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Nigel Burch
v
Douglas Parkinson and anor

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Paul Anthony Shaw

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Charles John Rattray

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Andrew Eric Roach

To Follow
For Special Hearing
Gary Hilton Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Acting Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul James Abraham
Anthony Byron Young

For Directions Hearing
TWD
MAG

For Legal Argument
Quentin John Lucas

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of the Director of Public Prosecutions versus Darrel George Harington was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Friday, 17 March 2017. The nature of the dispute involved criminal charges against Darrel George Harington, which were being prosecuted by the Director of Public Prosecutions. The matter was assigned to Justice TENNETT in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The central legal issue that the court had to address was the validity and applicability of certain legal principles or statutes in the context of the charges brought against Harington.

The court had to carefully consider the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence to determine whether the evidence and legal submissions were sufficient to uphold the charges. This involved an analysis of the legal standards and precedents relevant to the case. The court also had to ensure that the rights of the accused were protected throughout the proceedings. The outcome of the case was influenced by the interpretation of these legal standards and the application of the evidence provided.

Justice TENNETT delivered a reasoned judgment, weighing the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the relevant laws and the circumstances of the case. The final outcome of the case, however, was not explicitly stated in the provided text, leaving it to the reader to infer the court's ruling based on the detailed reasoning provided.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established