Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 11 March 2016

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 11 MARCH 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Jason Kerry Luttrell

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

Zachariah Angus Denwer-Ripper

For Mention

Lisa Marie Triffitt

For Plea

Logan Kele Smith

Adam Robert Desmond Latham

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Mark Anthony Bennett

For Bail Application

Garry James Brodie

In Court

Not Before 11:30 a.m.

For Application for Adjournment

Rodney Matthew Klye

Jodie Diane Earley

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
James Ernest Davey

In Court as in Chambers
Not Before 11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Prudence Michelle Pennicott

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing via video-link
from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice Heerey
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Helen Marie Wood
v
Retirement Benefits Fund Board

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing via video-link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jesse Christopher Hrycyszyn

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
John Benjamin Adams

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision
Kurt von Stalheim

10:00am
In Court
For Hearing
Mark Purton and Judith Purton
v Maureen Faye Jackson and Athol Charles Jackson
and Waratah Wynyard Council

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The document presents the law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, detailing various cases scheduled for hearing on a particular Friday, March 11, 2016. The cases cover both criminal and civil jurisdictions, with hearings held in various locations across Tasmania, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The list includes matters such as pleas, bail applications, and directions hearings, some of which are conducted via video-link due to the location of the defendants or plaintiffs. The document specifies the court, the time of hearing, and the nature of the case for each entry.

The legal issues addressed in these cases range from preliminary criminal proceedings, pleas, and bail applications, to civil disputes involving directions hearings, guardianship matters, and retirement benefits. The court was tasked with managing the scheduling and procedural aspects of these diverse cases, ensuring that each party received a fair and timely hearing. Additionally, the court had to consider the logistical challenges posed by the geographical distribution of the parties and the necessity of conducting some hearings via video-link.

In handling these cases, the court demonstrated a commitment to efficiency and accessibility. The use of video-link technology facilitated the participation of parties who could not be physically present in the courtroom, ensuring that the legal process remained inclusive and effective. The court's meticulous scheduling and the clear delineation of each case's specifics underscore the importance of orderly proceedings and the need for precise judicial administration. This approach not only ensured that each party's rights were upheld but also maintained the integrity and efficiency of the judicial process.

The final orders or outcomes of the cases were not detailed in the document. However, the document serves as an official record of the scheduled hearings and the logistical arrangements made to accommodate the various cases. The detailed listing underscores the court's role in managing a diverse caseload and ensuring that all legal matters are addressed in a timely and efficient manner.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established