Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 10 July 2020

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 10 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00am
For Directions Hearing via telephone

Shanyin Liu v Lottham Mining Pty Ltd

9:15am
For Mention via video link

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Frederick William Hunn

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions

Barry James Ambrose Cook

Blaise Christopher Baddeley

Jackson Elijah Mansfield

Brett Knox

Garry Matthews

Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer

For Bail Application

Mark Anthony Dillon

11:30am
For Sentence

Bailey Dennis Roberts

For Bail Application

Sean Patrick Mahoney

Colin Anthony Jacobson

2:15pm
For Directions

Robert Maxwell Brown

JSF

For Bail Variation

Cameron Scott Clark

For Bail Application

Ricky John Polglase

2:30pm

For Bail Application

Todd Michael Walker

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am

ANGEL, Tyler
S H

2.15 pm

LAWRIE, Jordan

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a list of cases was scheduled for hearing on 10 July 2020. Among these cases, Shanyin Liu v Lottham Mining Pty Ltd was listed for a directions hearing via telephone, and Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Frederick William Hunn was listed for a mention via video link. The court also scheduled a range of criminal matters, including bail applications and sentencing. The proceedings were conducted with adjustments to accommodate the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of video links and telephone conferencing.

The legal issues in these cases varied. In the civil case of Shanyin Liu v Lottham Mining Pty Ltd, the court was likely to address procedural matters related to the conduct of the case. For the mention in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Frederick William Hunn, the court would determine the next steps in the proceedings between the bank and the defendant, Frederick William Hunn. In the criminal cases, the court faced issues such as whether to grant or vary bail for various defendants, and whether to proceed with bail applications or sentencing.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the document, but it is expected that the court would address each matter according to the legal principles and evidence presented. For civil matters, the court would likely provide directions to manage the case effectively. In criminal proceedings, the court would assess the risk factors and circumstances of each defendant to make decisions on bail. The outcomes of these hearings would set the course for the respective cases, whether it be advancing the litigation process, managing the defendant's liberty, or scheduling further hearings.

The final orders of the court would be documented separately and would detail the specific outcomes and directions given in each case. The decisions would reflect the court's assessment of the evidence and legal arguments presented, aiming to balance the rights of the parties with the administration of justice.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established