Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court Of Tasmania for Wednesday, 4 October 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 226


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR WEDNESDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2017

AMENDED LISTS FOR HOBART AND LAUNCESTON

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Lai Le


  1. State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

2:00 p.m.
For Decision via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Peter Francis Thomas Brooks
v
Barry Maxwell Easther, Norma Lynn Mason and The Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court

2:15 p.m.

For Bail Application via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
NTP

For Plea in Mitigation via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
MAC

4.15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

MDR

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Andrew James Bellamy

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Appoint Administrator
James Crotty & anor
v
The Attorney General

11:00 a.m.
Set Aside Judgment
Jane Dutton
v
Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary Pty Ltd

2:15 p.m.
Set Aside Third Party Notice
Sean Dicker
v
Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd and ors

Directions/Interrogatories
Barminco Limited
v
Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Gunns Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Manager Appointed) and ors
v
KPMG (A Firm) and ors

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Nigel Burch
v
Douglas Parkinson

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Disputed Facts Hearing
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson

4:00pm For Bail Application
Christine Joy Radford

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Jack Dale
(Part Heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
2:00 p.m.
For Decision via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Peter Francis Thomas Brooks
v
Barry Maxwell Easther, Norma Lynn Mason and The Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania

Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
2:15 p.m.

For Bail Application via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
NTP

For Plea in Mitigation via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MAC

4.15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

MDR

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court Of Tasmania for Wednesday, 4 October 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 226
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 226
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania outline various cases scheduled for hearing on October 4, 2017, in both Hobart and Launceston. Notable cases include a bail application for Lai Le, a criminal matter, and a civil case involving Peter Francis Thomas Brooks against Barry Maxwell Easther, Norma Lynn Mason, and The Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania. The lists also indicate video link hearings for some cases and directions hearings in both cities.

The legal issues before the court encompass bail applications, pleas in mitigation, sentencing, and civil disputes. The court was required to decide whether to grant bail in the criminal cases, to consider the plea in mitigation of the accused, and to provide directions and set aside judgments in the civil matters. The court's decisions would affect the procedural aspects of these cases and could significantly impact the defendants' rights and obligations.

The reasoning and outcome of the court's decisions are not provided in the list, but the scheduled hearings indicate that the court was expected to consider various legal arguments and evidence presented by the parties. The court's decisions would be made based on the legal principles and precedents relevant to each case. The final orders for these cases would be communicated separately and would reflect the court's determinations on the issues at hand.

The amended law lists detail the procedural steps and court appearances required for the cases listed, reflecting the ongoing judicial process in Tasmania. The scheduled hearings and decisions underscore the court's role in managing and resolving both criminal and civil matters. The outcomes of these hearings would be critical in advancing the legal proceedings for each party involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.