Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 29 September 2017

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR FRIDAY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2017

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Jason Darrell Triffett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Duc Van Nguyen

For Mention

BC
BDR

Joshua Blair Read
Sasha Djuro Botak
BGB
Dillin Leigh Michael Schultz

For Directions Hearing
Martyn John Carpenter
SJH

For Bail Consent
LR
Paul Joseph Newman
Ashley Edward Turner

For Disputed Facts Hearing
Lee-Anne Marie Levett

For Plea
Andrew James Bellamy

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
2:15 p.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Brocklands Pty Ltd
V
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd ACN 167 357 299

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
WKS

10:00am For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness

2:15pm For Mention
A Witness

To Follow for Sentence
CJL
4:00pm For Bail Application
Ashley Peter Smith

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jack Dale

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, dated 29 September 2017, outline several cases scheduled for that day. These cases span across both criminal and civil jurisdictions and involve various types of hearings, including bail applications, directions hearings, mention hearings, and trials. The cases involve individuals such as Jason Darrell Triffett, Duc Van Nguyen, Joshua Blair Read, and others. The legal matters include a bail application, directions hearings, mention hearings, and a trial. The cases were presided over by various justices, including Justice ESTCOURT, Acting Justice PORTER, Chief Justice BLOW, and others. The locations of the hearings are specified as either Hobart or Launceston.

The court was required to address several legal issues in these cases. These include determining whether bail should be granted to individuals such as Jason Darrell Triffett and Ashley Peter Smith, providing directions in various cases, addressing mention hearings, and proceeding with trials and plea hearings. The legal issues also included resolving civil disputes, as seen in the case involving Brocklands Pty Ltd and VTasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The court needed to consider the specific circumstances of each case, the relevant legal principles, and the evidence presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were determined based on the specific legal issues and the evidence presented. For instance, in the bail application cases, the court considered factors such as the risk of flight, the risk to the community, and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court. In the directions hearings, the court provided guidance on the procedural steps to be taken in the case. For the mention hearings, the court addressed any procedural or legal issues that had arisen. The court also proceeded with trials and plea hearings, where the facts of the case were examined, and the guilt or innocence of the accused was determined. The final outcome of each case would depend on the specific findings and decisions made by the court.

The final orders made by the court would reflect the outcomes of the hearings and trials. These orders could include granting or denying bail, providing directions for the next steps in the case, or making a final determination on the guilt or innocence of the accused in criminal cases. In civil cases, the court's orders could include resolving disputes, awarding damages, or providing other legal remedies. The exact nature of the final orders would be determined by the specific circumstances and findings of each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established