Legal Research
Cases
Amazon Creek Pty Ltd v DVLPMNT Group Pty Ltd & McLeod

Amazon Creek Pty Ltd v DVLPMNT Group Pty Ltd & McLeod

Case [2025] VCC 29

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Amazon Creek Pty Ltd v DVLPMNT Group Pty Ltd & McLeod [2025] VCC 29
Case: [2025] VCC 29
Decision Date: 31 January 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Amazon Creek Pty Ltd v DVLPMNT Group Pty Ltd & McLeod [2025] VCC 29

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

S v M [2025] NZHC 486
Citation 1 (Para 20)

…icklow & Wexford Railway Co v Slattery (1878) 3 App Cas 1155 (at 1201); Christmas v Nicol Bros Pty Ltd (1941) 41 SR (NSW) 317 (at 322); S v M (1984) 36 SASR 316 (at 319-320)).…
Adaz Nominees Pty Ltd v Castleway Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 201
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…he parties are operating. (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added) [30] [2020] VSCA 201 at [70].…
Bisognin v Hera Project Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 322
Citation 3

…lt – Whether vendor entitled to damages – Principles of contractual interpretation Legislation Cited: Cases Cited: Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 322; Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91; Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515; Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd v EBS Consulting Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 1…
Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 323
Citation 4 (Para 5)

…to prevent the estate agent from doing so, this may amount to a representation by the principal.[15] [10] POCS [127] – [137]. [11] Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 323 at [58]; Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515…
Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515
Citation 5 (Para 5)

…A 323 at [58]; Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515. [12] Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515; Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 323 at [57…
Cubillo v Commonwealth [2001] FCA 1213
Citation 6 (Para 20)

…ct the whole of a witness’ evidence, or to accept parts of their evidence and to reject the remaining: O'Loughlin J in Cubillo v Commonwealth (2000) 174 ALR 97 [118]-[125] (citing with approval Dublin, Wicklow & Wexford Railway Co v Slattery (1878) 3 App Cas 1155 (at 1201); Christmas v Nicol Bros Pty Ltd (1941) 41 S…
Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) [2000] FCA 1084
Citation 7 (Para 20)

…berty to accept or reject the whole of a witness’ evidence, or to accept parts of their evidence and to reject the remaining: O'Loughlin J in Cubillo v Commonwealth (2000) 174 ALR 97 [118]-[125] (citing with approval Dublin, Wicklow & Wexford Railway Co v Slattery (1878) 3 App Cas 1155 (at 1201); Christmas v Nicol Bros Pty Ltd…
Perri v Coolangatta Investments Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 29
Citation 8

…rl Hallion [2024] VSC 805; Adaz Nominees Pty Ltd v Castleway Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 201; Perri v Coolangatta Investments Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 537…
Brien v Dwyer [1978] HCA 50
Citation 9 (Para 5)

…– [137]. [11] Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 323 at [58]; Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515. [12] Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515;…
Petersen v Moloney [1951] HCA 57
Citation 10 (Para 5)

…his may amount to a representation by the principal.[15] [10] POCS [127] – [137]. [11] Lo v Russell [2016] VSCA 323 at [58]; Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 95 (Dixon, Fullagar and Kitto JJ) 94-95; Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; Markson v Cutler [2007] NSWSC 1515. [12] Peterson v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91, 9…
EMR Capital Investment (No. 6B) Pte Ltd v Carl Hallion [2024] VSC 805
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…onan relied on a summary of the principles by Lyons J in EMR Capital Investment (no 6B) Pte Ltd v Carl Hallion [29] (which summary I adopt): [29] [2024] VSC 805 at [185]. “The legal principles expressed in Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (‘Mount Bruce’) succinctly summarise how courts are…
Tan v Russell [2016] VSC 93
Citation 12 (Para 10)

…uthorities he cited at POCS [127] – [137], followed the line of argument and supporting authorities in the decision of Cameron J in Tan v Russell [2016] VSC 93. This was the first instance decision from which Lo v Russell was the appeal. Mr Noonan submitted that the Court of Appeal in Lo v Russell rejected her H…
Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd v EBS Consulting Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 158
Citation 13 (Para 20)

…ly on Whelan J’s summary of the principles relevant to establishing ostensible authority in Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd v EBS Consulting Pty Ltd [24] [2007] VSC 158. After a comprehensive survey of the relevant authorities, his Honour summarised the principles at [203] as follows (which I adopt): “The principles wh…

AI Chat coming soon