FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| AMATO & AMATO | [2013] FCCA 942 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Child maintenance – wife’s application for lump sum child maintenance where husband has ceased to be a resident of Australia or a reciprocating country for the purposes of child support – husband has failed to pay maintenance for the child since April 2012 – husband has failed to take part in these proceedings – orders made for husband to pay lump sum child maintenance. |
| Legislation: |
| Collins & Collins (1993) FLC 92-343 RNL & RHB [2005] FMCAfam 520 Bereat & Bereat [2010] FamCA 693 |
| Applicant: | MS AMATO |
| Respondent: | MR AMATO |
| File Number: | MLC 812 of 2010 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Bender |
| Hearing date: | 18 July 2013 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 18 July 2013 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 26 July 2013 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Cash |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Manby & Scott Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | NA |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | NA |
ORDERS
On or before 26 August 2013 the husband pay to the wife child maintenance for the child, X born (omitted) 1999 (“X”), in the sum of $76,200.00 by way of a lump sum payment.
Order 6 of the orders made 22 May 2013 be dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Amato & Amato is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLC 812 of 2010
| MS AMATO |
Applicant
And
| MR AMATO |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is the wife’s application seeking the husband pay child maintenance for the parties’ son, X born (omitted) 1999 (“X”).
These proceedings were commenced by the wife’s Initiating Application filed 13 December 2012. On 24 June 2013 the wife filed an Amended Initiating Application seeking orders in the following terms:
a)The husband pay to the wife child maintenance for X at the rate of $20,000.00 per annum from 1 July 2012 until 8 November 2017.
b)The child maintenance be capitalised and paid to the wife by way of one lump sum payment of $90,000.00 within 28 days of such an order being made.
c)The husband pay the wife’s costs on an indemnity basis.
At the hearing of this matter the wife was given leave to amend her application such that she now seeks an order that the husband pay child maintenance as from 13 December 2012, being the date she filed the Initiating Application.
The husband has failed to participate in these proceedings.
The wife’s application was first listed on 21 December 2012. On that occasion the husband failed to appear. An order was made adjourning the matter to 20 May 2013 and it was noted in the orders made that day that the husband had been taken to have been served with the wife’s application for child maintenance on 20 December 2012. The wife’s then solicitors were ordered to…
Continue reading Amato and Amato
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- AMATO & AMATO [2013] FCCA 942
- Case
- [2013] FCCA 942
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate quantum of child maintenance payable by the husband to the wife.
The court ordered the lump sum payment after considering the relevant circumstances. The court also dismissed Order 6 of previous orders made on 22 May 2013.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
On or before 26 August 2013 the husband pay to the wife child maintenance for the child, X born (omitted) 1999 (“X”), in the sum of $76,200.00 by way of a lump sum payment.
2.
Order 6 of the orders made 22 May 2013 be dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.