refused. The Society thereupon made an application to this Court under sec. 60 (3) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904. The application is based on numerous grounds; and I have decided against the application on all the grounds except such grounds as involve the questions hereinafter set forth-questions arising in the proceedings which, in my opinion, are questions of law. If and SO far as the matter rests in my discretion, I exercise my discretion against the applicants on the excepted grounds also."
(The case then incorporated the rules of the Institute and of the Society, and Statutory Rules 1905, Nos. 23 and 70.)
"The questions are :-
1. Is the 'shipping industry' an industry within the meaning of sec. 55 1 (b) of the Act
2. If so, is the Institute properly registered as an association in or in connection with the shipping industry ?
3. If the answer is in the negative to either of the questions 1 and 2, is it the duty of this Court to order that the registration of the Institute be cancelled ? "
McArthur, for the applicants. With regard to employés, ship- ping is not an industry within the meaning of sec. 55 (1) (b) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904. In the definition of "industry" in sec. 4 the words " business, trade, manufacture, undertaking" refer to employers and "calling, service, or employment" refer to employés. Men whose callings, services or employments are of many different kinds may be employed in connection with shipping, but shipping cannot be said to be the " industry" of all of them. The industry in con- nection with which marine engineers are employed is not shipping but engineering. Shipping cannot be said to be the "calling, service or employment" of marine engineers.
[He also referred to the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, secs. 2 (vi.), 58, 59, Schedule B.; Statutory Rules 1905, No. 23, r. 4; Jumbunna Coal Mine, No Liability V. Victorian Coal Miners' Association (1).
16 C.L.R., 309, at p. 370.