ALVISIO & BARBARESCO

Case [2018] FCCA 3537


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ALVISIO & BARBARESCO [2018] FCCA 3537
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Mother seeks to relocate from country New South Wales to start new life with new partner in Queensland – Mother’s evidence was to the effect that she has been and continues to be subject to “mafia-esque” intimidation from the Father, his family and his friends – evidence of family consultant equivocal in certain respects and dubious about the relocation but also clear about the children living primarily with the Mother – best interest considerations – Mother’s Application supported by Independent Children’s Lawyer – Application granted.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss.60CC(3)(a) – (l), 65DAA

Cases cited:

AMS v AIF (1999) 199 CLR 160

B & B [2006] FamCA 1207

Blanding v Blanding (2017) 55 Fam LR 218

Bolitho & Cohen (2005) 33 Fam LR 471; (2005) FLC ¶93-224

Cales & Cales (2010) 251 FLR 454; (2010) 44 Fam LR 376

Collu & Rinaldo [2010] FamCAFC 53

F v F (2008) 38 Fam LR 52

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118

Godfrey v Sanders (2007) 208 FLR 287; [2007] FamCA 102

Goode v Goode (2007) 36 Fam LR 422

Hepburn & Noble (2010) FLC ¶93-438

M v S (2008) 37 Fam LR 32

Mazorski v Albright (2007) 37 Fam LR 518

McCall v Clark (2009) 41 Fam LR 483

Moose & Moose (2008) FLC ¶93-375

MRR v GR (2010) 240 CLR 461

Paskandy & Paskandy (1999) FLC ¶92-878

Payne v Payne [2001] Fam 473

Powell & Ptolemy (2005) FLC ¶93-239

Sealey & Archer [2008] FamCAFC 142

Sheldon & Weir (No.3) [2010] FamCA 1138

Starr & Duggan [2009] FamCAFC 115

Taylor & Barker (2008) 37 Fam LR 461

U v U (2002) 211 CLR 238

Vontek v Vontek [2017] FamCAFC 28

Wiley & Wiley [2008] FamCAFC 153

Applicant: MS ALVISIO
Respondent: MR BARBARESCO
File Number: CAC 1874 of 2017
Judgment of: Judge Neville
Hearing dates: 9-10 August, 2 November 2018
Date of Last Submission: 3 December 2018
Delivered at: Canberra
Delivered on: 21 December 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Giacomo
Solicitors for the Applicant: Cater & Blumer
Solicitors for the Respondent: BJH Lawyer

Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer:

Mr Lawrence

Solicitors for the Independent Children's Lawyer:

Legal Aid NSW

ORDERS

  1. The parties have equal shared parental responsibility for the children; [X] (born: …2008) and [Y] (born: …2009) (“the children”).

  2. The children live with the Mother.

  3. The Mother be permitted to relocate to Town A with the children and reside there on a permanent basis.

  4. The children spend time with the Father as agreed between the parties and, failing an agreement, as follows:

    (a)For the entirety of the first, second and third school holidays from the first day of the holidays until 5pm the last day of the holidays;

    (b)For the entirety of the fourth term/Christmas holidays in even years except for the last week;

    (c)For the entirety of the fourth term/Christmas holidays in odd years except from 23…

Continue reading ALVISIO & BARBARESCO

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Alvisio and Barbaresco [2018] FCCA 3537
Case
[2018] FCCA 3537
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of ALVISIO & BARBARESCO, Judge Neville of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the Mother for permission to relocate with the parties' two children, born in 2008 and 2009, from country New South Wales to Queensland. The Mother's stated reason for the proposed relocation was to commence a new life with her new partner. The Mother's evidence alleged ongoing intimidation from the Father, his family, and his friends, described as "mafia-esque." The Independent Children's Lawyer supported the Mother's application.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed relocation of the children to Queensland was in their best interests, considering all relevant circumstances. This required the Court to weigh the Mother's desire to relocate and her stated reasons against the Father's parental rights and the children's established connections and welfare. The Court also had to consider the evidence presented by a family consultant, which was noted as being equivocal in some aspects regarding the relocation but clear on the children primarily living with the Mother.

Judge Neville granted the Mother's application to relocate the children to Queensland. The Court ordered that the parties share equal parental responsibility for the children, with the children to live with the Mother. The specific terms of the orders detailed the arrangements for the children spending time with the Father, including during school holidays and weekends, and established protocols for communication, travel costs, and the exchange of information regarding the children's schooling and medical care. The orders also included provisions for respectful communication between the parents and restrictions on discussing the proceedings or denigrating the other parent in front of the children.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The parties have equal shared parental responsibility for the children; [X] (born: …2008) and [Y] (born: …2009) (“the children”).

2.

The children live with the Mother.

3.

The Mother be permitted to relocate to Town A with the children and reside there on a permanent basis.

4.

The children spend time with the Father as agreed between the parties and, failing an agreement, as follows:

(a) For the entirety of the first, second and third school holidays from the first day of the holidays until 5pm the last day of the holidays;

(b) For the entirety of the fourth term/Christmas holidays in even years except for the last week;

(c) For the entirety of the fourth term/Christmas holidays in odd years except from 23 December to 2 January; and

(d) On all weekends where a public holiday falls on either the Friday or the Monday, if the father travels to Town A.

5.

Changeover will occur with either the children flying from Town B to Sydney and Sydney to Town C, or the parties meeting halfway at Town D.

6.

The Mother is to pay all travel costs associated with the children spending time with the Father pursuant to Order 4.

7.

The children have telephone communication with the parent with whom they are not living each evening, with the parent they are not with to telephone the children at 6pm.

8.

If Father’s Day falls outside the Father’s time with the children in accordance with these orders, in the event the Father travels to Town A then the children shall spend time with him (with such time occurring in Town A) on Father’s Day weekend from after school on Friday immediately prior to Father’s Day until before school Monday;

9.

For the purpose of order 8 above the Father must provide the mother with written notice by way of text message and / or email of his intention to spend time with the children in Town A at least fourteen (14) days prior to such time occurring;

10.

Each parent shall authorise any school the children attend to advise the other parents of any information they require, copies of all school reports, examples of school work, school newsletters, notification of all school activities, parent/teacher nights, and inform the other parent of any emergency, remedial or correctional treatment required by the child/children as soon as practicable.

11.

Each parent shall authorise any treating medical practitioner, dental practitioner, hospital or medical practice that the child/children shall attend from time to time to provide to the other parent any information regarding the child/children.

12.

If the children fall ill such that one of the parents takes the child to the doctor, that parent shall notify the other parent of the doctor’s contact details, any medication prescribed and any treatment recommended. Each parent shall administer such medication when it falls due, adhere to any medical treatment plan and follow any directions from the doctor. Each parent is then restrained from seeking alternate medical treatment unless the condition appears to deteriorate or does not improve.

13.

In the event of an emergency or where the child/children requires hospitalisation, then the parent who has care of the children shall notify the other immediately and supply details of the hospital or medical practitioner where the child has been taken.

14.

Each parent shall notify the other within 24 hours of any change in residential address.

15.

Each parent shall notify the other within 12 hours of any change in contact telephone number.

16.

Any communication between the parents remains respectful.

17.

Neither party nor their servants or agents shall post photographs of the children on social media.

18.

Neither parent nor their servants or agents shall denigrate the other party or their family or partner in front of or within hearing of the children.

19.

Neither parent nor their servants or agents shall discuss these proceedings in front of, with or within hearing of the children.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.