Alvey & Cheetham (No 2)

Case [2021] FedCFamC1F 358


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Alvey & Cheetham (No 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 358

File number(s): MLC 9184 of 2020
Judgment of: STRUM J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2021
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – UNDEFENDED HEARING – PROPERTY – Settlement – Addbacks – Exception not the rule –Where an addback is sought due to a discrepancy in the sale price of the business disclosed to the wife by the husband and the actual sale price – Where such an addback is allowed.
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 90SF, 90SM, 90ST, 117
Cases cited:

AJO & GRO [2005] FamCAFC 104; (2005) GLC 93-218

C & C [1998] FamCA 143

Penfold v Penfold (1980) 144 CLR 311; (1980) 5 Fam LR 579; (1980) FLC 90-800; [1980] HCA 4.

Prantage & Prantage [2014] FamCA 850

Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173

Division: Division 1 First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 58
Date of hearing: 20 December 2021
Place: Melbourne
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Lethlean
Solicitor for the Applicant: Aspire Lawyers
Advocate for the Respondent: In person
Solicitor for the Respondent: None

ORDERS

MLC 9184 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MS ALVEY

Applicant

AND:

MR CHEETHAM

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

STRUM J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2021

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Within 60 days of the date of the orders the Applicant pay to the Respondent the sum of $176,000 (“the payment”), less the sum of $40,000 payable by him to her pursuant to paragraph 26.

2.Contemporaneously with the payment:

(a)The Respondent do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be required to transfer to the Applicant at the expense of the Applicant all of his right, title and interest in the real property situate at and known as E Street, Suburb J in the State of Victoria being the whole of the land more particularly described in Certificate of Title Volume … Folio … ("the Suburb J property") (“the transfer”).

(b)The Applicant do all such things to refinance and discharge the mortgage registered No. …9C to H Bank ("the mortgage").

3.That pending the transfer:

(a)The Applicant have the sole right to occupy the Suburb J property and that during such right of occupation the Applicant pay all instalments pursuant to the mortgage and all rates and taxes and like apportionable outgoings of the Suburb J property as they fall due;

(b)The parties hold their respective interest/s in the Suburb J property upon trust pursuant to these Orders; and

(c)That neither party encumber the Suburb J property except without the consent in writing of the other party, save for the Applicant to comply with order 1 herein.

4.That in the event the payment has not been made by the date, the Applicant have carriage of the sale and the parties do all things and sign all documents necessary to sell altogether out of Court ("the sale") the real property situate at and known…

Continue reading Alvey & Cheetham (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Alvey & Cheetham (No 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 358
Case
[2021] FedCFamC1F 358
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter is a property settlement application following the breakdown of a long-term de facto relationship. Ms Alvey, the Applicant, sought an adjustment of interests in property pursuant to section 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The Respondent, Mr Cheetham, did not participate in the proceedings, either by filing any material or appearing at the hearing. The Court found that it was just and equitable to adjust the interests in property between the parties. The Court ordered that Ms Alvey pay Mr Cheetham $176,000, less $40,000 in costs, to be deducted from the payment. The Court also ordered a transfer of property, payment of debts, and a superannuation split. The Court found that circumstances existed that justified it in making an order for costs in favour of the Applicant. The Court ordered that the Respondent pay the Applicant's costs of and incidental to these proceedings, fixed in the sum of $40,000, to be deducted from the payment by the Applicant to the Respondent.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.