| [2017] FWCA 3259 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Alstom Grid Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/2146)
ALSTOM GRID AUSTRALIA LIMITED (SERVICE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 15 JUNE 2017 |
Application for termination of the ALSTOM GRID Australia Limited (Service) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] On 16 December 2016, Alstom Grid Australia Pty Ltd (the Employer) made an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the ALSTOM GRID Australia Limited (Service) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] The application was supported by a statutory declaration from the Employer that declared, amongst other things, that there are no employees of the Employer who are covered by the Agreement.
[3] Section 226 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.225 of the Act. Section 226 of the Act provides as follows:
‘226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.’
Consideration
[4] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration filed with the application, in consideration of s.226(a), I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against the termination of the Agreement.
[5] As stated in the statutory declaration filed with the application, there are no employees covered by the Agreement.
[6] In consideration of the material before me relevant to s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[7] In accordance with s.226, I must terminate the Agreement. The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.
[8] The termination will take effect from 15 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE400719 PR593752>
- AGLC
- Alstom Grid Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 3259
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3259
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered whether the changes to the enterprise were of such a nature and extent that the enterprise agreement should be terminated under section 232 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the enterprise had experienced significant changes in its structure, workforce, and operational processes, leading to a misalignment between the agreement and the current business environment. The Commission assessed the evidence provided by the applicant and the respondent, evaluating the extent of the changes and their impact on the enforceability of the agreement.
After reviewing the evidence, the Commission found that the changes to the enterprise were significant and warranted the termination of the existing agreement. The changes included alterations in the business structure, a reduction in the workforce, and modifications to operational processes, which had fundamentally transformed the nature of the enterprise. The Commission concluded that these changes had rendered the agreement impractical and unable to be effectively enforced. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission terminated the Alstom Grid Australia Limited (Service) Enterprise Agreement 2013, effective from a specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.