Alouwayed (Migration)

[2022] AATA 1433

Alouwayed (Migration) [2022] AATA 1433 (3 May 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mrs Hanadi Alouwayed

CASE NUMBER:  2201949

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2018/3990641

MEMBER:Meena Sripathy

DATE:3 May 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 100 visa, for the purposes of cl.100.222:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)

Statement made on 03 May 2022 at 10:34am

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa – Subclass 100 (Spouse) – criminal history – Australian Federal Police National Police Certificate provided upon review – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 100.222; Schedule 4, Public Interest Criterion 4001; r 2.03AA

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 28 June 2018. The criteria for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations.

3. Regulation 2.03AA of the Regulations applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: reg 2.03AA(1). In this case, cl. 100.222 of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in reg 2.03AA(2).

4. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: reg 2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

5. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 21 January 2022 on the basis that the applicant did not meet reg 2.03AA because the applicant was requested to provide, and did not provide, a National Police Certificate issued by the AFP.

6. On 31 March 2022 the Tribunal received from the applicant a National Police Certificate dated 25 March 2022 for the applicant.

7. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

8. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided a statement by an appropriate authority that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history.

   Has the applicant provided a statement from an appropriate authority?

9. On 18 October 2021, and again on 18 November 2021, the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide, among other information,  a National Police Certificate issued by the AFP. No response was provided by the time of the delegate’s decision and the application was refused on the basis that the applicant did not meet subregulation 2.03AA(2).

10. On 31 March 2022 the Tribunal received a National Police Certificate issued by the AFP dated 24 March 2022 relating to the applicant.

11. The applicant has provided a statement from an appropriate authority and therefore meets reg 2.03AA(2)(a).

    Conclusion

12. There is no evidence that the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a completed approved Form 80, therefore the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(b) does not apply.

13. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets reg 2.03AA(2).

    DECISION

14. The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 100 visa for the purposes of cl.100.222:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

    Meena Sripathy
    Member