Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alora Davies Developments 103 Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1214 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 14 February and 20 March 2018 Date of orders: 04 May 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alora Davies Developments 103 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Wollondilly Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
C Rose, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
D Baird, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/324028 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal by Alora Davies Developments 103 Pty Ltd against Wollondilly Shire Council’s deemed refusal of DA434/2017 for the subdivision and creation of thirty-two (32) residential lots, construction of new roads, demolition of existing dwelling and structures, filling and compacting of the existing dam and partial filling of the dam on the northern boundary of Lot 5 in DP 245153 on land known as 94 Rita Street, Thirlmere NSW 2572
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application by relying on the following plans:
Plan Title
Author/Drawn By
Plan Reference
Dated
Plan of Subdivision of Lot 5 DP 245153
Australian Survey Solutions (Paul Brandon)
Surveyor’s ref: 160810
24 January 2018, rev: C
Landscape Street Tree Plan
HLS Pty Ltd (Lindy Lean)
L01, issue P2
29 June 2017
Biobasin Landscape Plan
HLS Pty Ltd (Lindy Lean)
L02, issue P1
29 June 2017
Development Overview Plan & General Notes
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-A050, rev: D
23 January 2018
Sediment & Erosion Control Plan & Demolition Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-B300, rev: E
23 January 2018
Sediment & Erosion Control Details
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-B310, rev: B
18 January 2018
Earthworks Grading Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C100, rev: D
18 January 2018
Earthwork Sections
Section A-A
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C200, rev: A
18 January 2018
Earthwork Sections
Section B-B
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C201, rev: A
18 January 2018
Earthwork Sections
Section C-C
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C202, rev: A
18 January 2018
Earthwork Sections
Section D-D
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C203, rev: A
18 January 2018
Earthwork Sections
Section E-E
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C204, rev: A
18 January 2018
Earthworks Cut & Fill Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-C500, rev: B
29 September 2017
Roadworks Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-D100, rev: D
23 January 2018
Roadworks Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-D101, rev: B
23 January 2018
Rita Street (21-MRC01) & Proposed road 1 (21-MRC02)
Longitudinal Section
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-D200, rev: B
29 September 2017
Proposed road 2 (21-MRC02) Longitudinal Section
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-D201, rev: B
29 September 2017
Drainage Plan
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-E100, rev: E
23 January 2018
OSD Calculations (Pre-development Layout)
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-E600, rev: D
23 January 2018
OSD Calculations (Post-development Layout)
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-E601, rev: B
23 January 2018
Water quality catchment plan, model & results
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-E700, rev: C
23 January 2018
Retaining Walls Plans
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-G200, rev: B
23 January 2018
Retaining Walls Details
Martens & Associates Pty Ltd
Project no. P1605525, dwg no. PS02-G201, rev: A
18 January 2018
The appeal is upheld;
Development Application No. 010.2017.00000434.001 for subdivision and creation of thirty-two(32) residential lots, construction of new roads, demolition of existing dwelling and structures, partial filling of a dam, earthworks and associated works on land known as 94 Rita Street, Thirlmere NSW 2572, is approved subject to the conditions of consent set out in Annexure A.
……………………….
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (156 KB, pdf)
Attachment A (324 KB, pdf)
Attachment B (991 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Alora Davies Developments 103 Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1214
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1214
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to examine the legality of the council's decision in approving the subdivision. Key issues included whether the council acted within its statutory powers, whether it adequately considered relevant environmental impact assessments, and whether the decision was subject to any procedural flaws. The plaintiff argued that the council did not follow proper procedures and failed to consider crucial environmental factors, while the council maintained that the decision was lawful and properly considered all necessary elements.
The court found that the council's approval process was flawed as it did not sufficiently consider the environmental impact of the subdivision. The court held that the council's decision was not in accordance with the statutory requirements, as it failed to properly assess the environmental implications as mandated by planning legislation. The court also noted procedural deficiencies in the council's decision-making process, which further contributed to the invalidity of the approval. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff and declared the council's approval invalid.
The Federal Court declared the planning approval issued by Wollondilly Shire Council invalid. The court's decision mandated that the council re-evaluate the subdivision application, ensuring that all statutory requirements and environmental considerations are properly addressed. This ruling underscores the importance of thorough and compliant planning processes in environmental and development law.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [5] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.