| [2017] FWCA 6595 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Allstyle Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd
(AG2017/3489)
ALLSTYLE CONCRETE PUMPING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 11 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Allstyle Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Allstyle Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Allstyle Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 December 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE426459 PR598552>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Allstyle Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 6595
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6595
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for the minimum entitlements specified in the Act and whether it was free from prohibited content. The court also needed to determine if the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and whether the required procedural steps had been complied with. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement appropriately addressed the needs of the employees and the business.
The Fair Work Commission held that the agreement substantially complied with the requirements of the Act. The court found that the agreement provided for all minimum entitlements and contained no prohibited content. It was determined that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and that the procedural steps had been properly followed. The court concluded that the agreement was fair and appropriate, taking into account the needs of both the employees and the business. As a result, the application for approval was granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.