| [2015] FWCA 7789 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Allied Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6102)
ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (QUEENSLAND BRANCH) A.C.N. 052 011 631 AND CEPU ELECTRICAL DIVISION QUEENSLAND UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE QUEENSLAND CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
Electrical contracting industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 13 NOVEMBER 2015 |
Application for termination of the Allied Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (Queensland Branch) A.C.N. 052 011 631 and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Union Collective Agreement for Queensland Children’s Hospital.
[1] On 9 November 2015 Allied Technologies Australia Pty Ltd filed an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) to terminate the Allied Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (Queensland Branch) A.C.N. 052 011 631 and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Union Collective Agreement for Queensland Children’s Hospital (“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that the nominal expiry date of the Agreement has passed. The employer has advised that there are no longer any employees covered by the Agreement. The CEPU (as a party covered by the Agreement) does not oppose the application to terminate.
[3] In having regard to the requirements of s.226 of the Act and based on the material that is before me, I am satisfied that:
- it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement; and
- taking into account all the circumstances, it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[4] In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the termination will come into effect today.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE891312 PR573890>
- AGLC
- Allied Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 7789
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 7789
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the application and the evidence presented by both parties. It considered the changes in the industry and the working environment, as well as the views of the employees represented by the union. The Commission found that the application did not meet the criteria for termination as the agreement was still relevant and in the best interests of the employees. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining a cooperative and constructive relationship between the employer and the union, particularly in the context of a children's hospital where the safety and wellbeing of patients were paramount.
Accordingly, the Commission dismissed the application for termination. It emphasised the importance of continuing to work together to ensure the best outcomes for all parties involved. The Commission's decision highlights the need for careful consideration of the criteria for termination and the importance of maintaining a cooperative and constructive relationship between employers and unions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.