| [2015] FWCA 3949 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
AllenCon Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1325)
ALLENCON PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 12 JUNE 2015 |
Application for approval of the AllenCon Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 3 June 2015 by AllenCon Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the AllenCon Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015(“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE414302 PR568266>
- AGLC
- AllenCon Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3949
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3949
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the provisions in the proposed agreement were consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether they met the procedural and substantive requirements for an enterprise agreement. The court considered whether the agreement provided for procedural fairness, adequate consultation, and whether it contained provisions that were contrary to public policy or were otherwise invalid. The union argued that certain clauses were inconsistent with the Act and would negatively impact employee rights.
The Fair Work Commission found that while the proposed agreement had been negotiated in good faith, some provisions did not comply with the Fair Work Act 2009. The court identified that certain clauses relating to employee entitlements did not meet the minimum standards prescribed by the Act. The Commission also noted that the dispute resolution mechanisms outlined in the agreement were not in line with the requirements of the Act, particularly in terms of procedural fairness. Consequently, the court refused to approve the agreement as it stood, but provided guidance on how the parties could amend the agreement to meet the necessary legal standards.
The court ordered that the agreement be returned to the parties for amendment to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission specified the areas where amendments were necessary, including the provisions on employee entitlements and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court directed that the parties resubmit the amended agreement for approval once these changes had been made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.