Court of Criminal Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allen v R (No 2) [2020] NSWCCA 196 Hearing dates: In chambers Date of orders: 07 August 2020 Decision date: 07 August 2020 Before: Bell P; Davies J; Button J Decision: Vary Order 4 of the Orders made on 22 July 2020 to insert the word “First” before “Indictment” and to add the words “and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment” after “Indictment” so that Order 4, as varied, reads:
“In respect of counts 2 and 4 – 25 of the First Indictment and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment, resentence the applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 18 months, which term of imprisonment is taken to have commenced on 15 March 2017 with an aggregate non-parole period of 12 months that expired on 14 March 2018.”
Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Michael Francis Allen (Appellant)
The Crown (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
R Roger (Applicant)
E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
Legal Aid NSW (Applicant)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/62653; 2017/80608 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- District Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Criminal
- Date of Decision:
- 07 June 2019
- Before:
- O’Brien AM DCJ
- File Number(s):
- 2017/62653; 2017/80608
Judgment
-
THE COURT: On 22 July 2020, the Court delivered its judgment in Allen v R [2020] NSWCCA 173 (the appeal judgment). Order 4 of the orders made on that day was as follows:
“In respect of counts 2 and 4-25 of the Indictment, resentence the Applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 18 months, which term of imprisonment is to be taken to have commenced on 15 March 2017, with an aggregate non-parole period of 12 months that expired on 14 March 2018”.
-
Mr Allen was charged on two indictments. The first indictment (the First Indictment), referred to at [1] of the appeal judgment, contained some 36 counts. Mr Allen was convicted on 30 of those counts. Of those counts on which he was convicted, counts 2 and 4-25 of the First Indictment related to what were described in the appeal judgment as “reporting offences”.
-
Mr Allen had also been charged on a second indictment (the Second Indictment) with two further reporting offences. He pleaded guilty to those counts on the first day of trial.
-
The aggregate sentence imposed by the trial judge was in respect of both of those counts as well as the counts on the First Indictment in respect of which Mr Allen was found guilty by the jury. For the reasons explained in the appeal judgment, it became necessary to resentence Mr Allen. As indicated at [107] of that judgment, all indicative sentences provided by the trial judge in relation to the reporting offences on both indictments were confirmed.
-
Order 4, as made on 22 July 2020 and by which Mr Allen was resentenced, referred in terms only to the reporting offences on the First Indictment in respect of which Mr Allen had been convicted. The resentence imposed in Order 4 of the orders made on 22 July 2020 (see [1] above) was intended, however, to apply not only to counts 2 and 4-25 of the First Indictment but also to both counts on the Second Indictment in respect of which Mr Allen had pleaded guilty and which were taken up in the aggregate sentence imposed by the trial judge.
-
The Court has implied or inherent power, of its own motion, to correct accidental slips and clerical mistakes such as the kind made in Order 4: see R v Green and Quinn [2011] NSWCCA 71.
-
Order 4 of the Orders made on 22 July 2020 should have read:
“In respect of counts 2 and 4 – 25 of the First Indictment and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment, resentence the applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 18 months, which term of imprisonment is taken to have commenced on 15 March 2017 with an aggregate non-parole period of 12 months that expired on 14 March 2018.” (changes marked in italics).
-
Accordingly, the following order should be made:
“Vary Order 4 of the Orders made on 22 July 2020 to insert the word “First” before “Indictment” and to add the words ‘and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment’ after “Indictment” so that Order 4, as varied, reads:
‘In respect of counts 2 and 4 – 25 of the First Indictment and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment, resentence the applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 18 months, which term of imprisonment is taken to have commenced on 15 March 2017 with an aggregate non-parole period of 12 months that expired on 14 March 2018.’”
**********
- AGLC
- Allen v R (No 2) [2020] NSWCCA 196
- Case
- [2020] NSWCCA 196
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Criminal Appeal examined the original order and the context in which it was made. The court acknowledged that the order, as initially made, did not explicitly include the reporting offences on the second indictment, despite these offences being part of the aggregate sentence imposed by the trial judge. The court recognised its inherent power to correct such errors and applied it to amend the order. The court determined that the resentence order should apply to all reporting offences, including those on the second indictment, and not just those on the first indictment. The court varied Order 4 of the orders made on 22 July 2020 by inserting the word "First" before "Indictment" and adding the words "and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment" after "Indictment".
The Court of Criminal Appeal varied Order 4 to ensure it correctly reflected the intended scope of the resentencing. The amended order now reads: "In respect of counts 2 and 4 – 25 of the First Indictment and counts 1 and 2 of the Second Indictment, resentence the applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 18 months, which term of imprisonment is taken to have commenced on 15 March 2017 with an aggregate non-parole period of 12 months that expired on 14 March 2018." This amendment ensures that the resentencing order encompasses all relevant reporting offences, as intended by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.