Allen v Johnstone No. DCCIV-01-1824
Case
•
[2004] SADC 56
•7 April 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Allen v Johnstone No. DCCIV-01-1824 [2004] SADC 56
[2004] SADC 56
7 April 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the South Australian District Court, Allen, the plaintiff, sued Johnstone, the defendant, for slanderous statements made by Johnstone during a joint venture committee meeting on 30 November 1998. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant's statements defamed him, leading to his dismissal, distress, and damage to his reputation and marriage. The defendant did not appear, and the court assessed the damages based on the plaintiff's evidence and affidavits.
The court identified the slanderous statements made by the defendant and their defamatory implications. It found that the statements were made, carried the meanings pleaded, and were slanderous of the plaintiff. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for the loss of his employment, general damages for reputational harm, emotional distress, and the impact on his marriage, and special damages for lost income and interest.
The court awarded special damages for the plaintiff's lost income, calculating a nett loss of $45,899 and interest of $12,500. For general damages, the court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of anxiety, shame, distress, and embarrassment and the impact on his marriage, awarding $15,000. The court assessed the plaintiff's total damages at $73,399.
The court did not award exemplary or aggravated damages, finding that the circumstances did not warrant such an award. The final orders were for the defendant to pay the plaintiff $73,399 in damages.
The court identified the slanderous statements made by the defendant and their defamatory implications. It found that the statements were made, carried the meanings pleaded, and were slanderous of the plaintiff. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for the loss of his employment, general damages for reputational harm, emotional distress, and the impact on his marriage, and special damages for lost income and interest.
The court awarded special damages for the plaintiff's lost income, calculating a nett loss of $45,899 and interest of $12,500. For general damages, the court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of anxiety, shame, distress, and embarrassment and the impact on his marriage, awarding $15,000. The court assessed the plaintiff's total damages at $73,399.
The court did not award exemplary or aggravated damages, finding that the circumstances did not warrant such an award. The final orders were for the defendant to pay the plaintiff $73,399 in damages.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
Legal Concepts
-
Defamation
-
Unjust Enrichment
-
Loss of Income
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Tropeano v Lauro [2010] SADC 113
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Simeone v Walker
[2009] SASC 201
C v L & ORS
[2005] SASC 315
Tropeano v Lauro
[2010] SADC 113
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd
[1993] HCA 31
Association of Quality Child Care Centres of NSW v Manefield
[2012] NSWCA 123
Association of Quality Child Care Centres of NSW v Manefield
[2012] NSWCA 123