Allen v Datson; Bennett obo Jemison v Datson

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read

DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Allen v Datson; Bennett obo Jemison v Datson [2007] QDC 123

PARTIES:

STACI KATHERINE ALLEN

(Applicant)

v

CHRISTOPHER REX DATSON

(Respondent)

and

WENDY ANNE BENNETT obo JACKIE LOUISE JEMISON

(Applicant)

v

CHRISTOPHER REX DATSON

(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

609/2006
601/2006

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application for criminal compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

Southport

DELIVERED ON:

21 June, 2007

DELIVERED AT:

Mt Isa

HEARING DATE:

2 February 2007

JUDGE:

Dearden DCJ

ORDER:

The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Staci Katherine Allen the sum of $12,500.

The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Wendy Anne Bennett on behalf of Jackie Louise Jemison the sum of $18,750.

CATCHWORDS:

Application – criminal compensation – mental or nervous shock

LEGISLATION:

Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) ss 20, 22(4), 24, 25(7), 26

Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (Qld) r 1A

CASES CITED:

R v Ward; ex parte Dooley [2001] 2 Qd R 436

Riddle v Coffey [2002] 133 A Crim R 220; [2002] QCA 337

R v Atwell; ex parte Jullie [2002] 2 Qd R 367

R v Kazakoff; ex parte Ferguson [2001] 2 Qd R 320

SAY v A2; ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2006] QCA 462

MAV v ABA; ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2007] QCA 124

Gottfried v Wills & Attorney-General [2004] QDC 2

COUNSEL:

Mr C Bagley for the applicants

Mr A Kimmins for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

McLaughlins for the applicants

Jacobson Mahoney Lawyers for the respondent

Introduction

  1. The applicant Staci Allen seeks compensation in respect of injuries suffered by her arising out of events occurring between 2 September 2002 and 22 April 2003, resulting in the respondent Christopher Rex Datson pleading before me in the Southport District Court on 4 November 2005 to three counts of indecently dealing with a child under 16 years who was under the respondent’s care.  The respondent was sentenced to two years imprisonment in respect of Count 1, wholly suspended, with an operational period of three years, and three years probation in respect of each of Counts 2 and 3.

  1. The applicant Jackie Louise Jemison (by her litigation guardian Wendy Anne Bennett) seeks compensation in respect of injuries suffered by her arising out of events which occurred between 5 December 2002 and 31 January 2003, resulting in the respondent Christopher Datson pleading guilty before me in the Southport District Court on 4 November 2005 to five counts of indecently dealing with a child under 16 years of whom the respondent was the guardian.  In respect of each of these counts, the respondent was sentenced to three years probation.

Facts

  1. The facts in respect of the offences committed against the two applicants were set out by the prosecutor at the sentence hearing.  These facts are as follows:[1]

    [1] Exhibit B (Sentence submissions) pp 2-5; Affidavit of Angus Walker sworn 1 December 2006

“With respect to the eight charges on the indictment, there are two complainants.  The first complainant is Staci Allen.  She is the niece of Wendy Bennett, who, at the relevant time, was…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Allen v Datson; Bennett obo Jemison v Datson and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2007] QDC 123
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved two separate applicants seeking compensation from the respondent, Christopher Rex Datson. Staci Katherine Allen and Wendy Anne Bennett, on behalf of Jackie Louise Jemison, were both victims of assault by Datson and sought compensation for the mental and nervous shock they suffered as a result. The case was heard in the relevant court of criminal jurisdiction in Australia.

The central legal issues revolved around the quantification of compensation for non-physical injuries such as mental or nervous shock. The court had to determine the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded to each applicant, taking into account the severity and impact of the shock on their lives. This involved assessing the evidence presented regarding the nature of the assaults, the subsequent psychological effects, and the applicants' personal circumstances.

In rendering its decision, the court carefully considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. It recognised the profound impact that the assaults had on the applicants' mental health and well-being. The court found that the compensation awards should reflect the significant harm caused. For Staci Katherine Allen, the court awarded $12,500, while for Jackie Louise Jemison, represented by Wendy Anne Bennett, the court awarded $18,750. These amounts were deemed adequate to compensate for the respective levels of mental and nervous shock experienced by the applicants.

Orders

Orders of the court

The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Staci Katherine Allen the sum of $12,500.

The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Wendy Anne Bennett on behalf of Jackie Louise Jemison the sum of $18,750.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.