DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Allen v Datson; Bennett obo Jemison v Datson [2007] QDC 123
PARTIES:
STACI KATHERINE ALLEN
(Applicant)
v
CHRISTOPHER REX DATSON
(Respondent)
and
WENDY ANNE BENNETT obo JACKIE LOUISE JEMISON
(Applicant)
v
CHRISTOPHER REX DATSON
(Respondent)
FILE NO/S:
609/2006
601/2006DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Application for criminal compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:
Southport
DELIVERED ON:
21 June, 2007
DELIVERED AT:
Mt Isa
HEARING DATE:
2 February 2007
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Staci Katherine Allen the sum of $12,500.
The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Wendy Anne Bennett on behalf of Jackie Louise Jemison the sum of $18,750.
CATCHWORDS:
Application – criminal compensation – mental or nervous shock
LEGISLATION:
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) ss 20, 22(4), 24, 25(7), 26
Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (Qld) r 1A
CASES CITED:
R v Ward; ex parte Dooley [2001] 2 Qd R 436
Riddle v Coffey [2002] 133 A Crim R 220; [2002] QCA 337
R v Atwell; ex parte Jullie [2002] 2 Qd R 367
R v Kazakoff; ex parte Ferguson [2001] 2 Qd R 320
SAY v A2; ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2006] QCA 462
COUNSEL:
Mr C Bagley for the applicants
Mr A Kimmins for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
McLaughlins for the applicants
Jacobson Mahoney Lawyers for the respondent
Introduction
The applicant Staci Allen seeks compensation in respect of injuries suffered by her arising out of events occurring between 2 September 2002 and 22 April 2003, resulting in the respondent Christopher Rex Datson pleading before me in the Southport District Court on 4 November 2005 to three counts of indecently dealing with a child under 16 years who was under the respondent’s care. The respondent was sentenced to two years imprisonment in respect of Count 1, wholly suspended, with an operational period of three years, and three years probation in respect of each of Counts 2 and 3.
The applicant Jackie Louise Jemison (by her litigation guardian Wendy Anne Bennett) seeks compensation in respect of injuries suffered by her arising out of events which occurred between 5 December 2002 and 31 January 2003, resulting in the respondent Christopher Datson pleading guilty before me in the Southport District Court on 4 November 2005 to five counts of indecently dealing with a child under 16 years of whom the respondent was the guardian. In respect of each of these counts, the respondent was sentenced to three years probation.
Facts
The facts in respect of the offences committed against the two applicants were set out by the prosecutor at the sentence hearing. These facts are as follows:[1]
[1] Exhibit B (Sentence submissions) pp 2-5; Affidavit of Angus Walker sworn 1 December 2006
“With respect to the eight charges on the indictment, there are two complainants. The first complainant is Staci Allen. She is the niece of Wendy Bennett, who, at the relevant time, was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Allen v Datson; Bennett obo Jemison v Datson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] QDC 123
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the quantification of compensation for non-physical injuries such as mental or nervous shock. The court had to determine the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded to each applicant, taking into account the severity and impact of the shock on their lives. This involved assessing the evidence presented regarding the nature of the assaults, the subsequent psychological effects, and the applicants' personal circumstances.
In rendering its decision, the court carefully considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. It recognised the profound impact that the assaults had on the applicants' mental health and well-being. The court found that the compensation awards should reflect the significant harm caused. For Staci Katherine Allen, the court awarded $12,500, while for Jackie Louise Jemison, represented by Wendy Anne Bennett, the court awarded $18,750. These amounts were deemed adequate to compensate for the respective levels of mental and nervous shock experienced by the applicants.
Orders
Orders of the court
The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Staci Katherine Allen the sum of $12,500.
The respondent Christopher Rex Datson pay the applicant Wendy Anne Bennett on behalf of Jackie Louise Jemison the sum of $18,750.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.