FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ALLEN & ALLEN | [2016] FCCA 163 |
| Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Evidence of discussions at a conciliation conference included in an affidavit – evidence of discussions at conciliation conference inadmissible. |
| Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s.131 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss. 75, 79 |
| Cases cited: Coroneos & Coroneos [2011] FamCA 12 Jarrott & Jarrott (No. 2) [2012] FamCAFC 72 |
| Applicant: | MR ALLEN |
| Respondent: | MS ALLEN |
| File Number: | SYC 709 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Scarlett |
| Hearing date: | 1 February 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 1 February 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 3 February 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Schonell |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | LCI Legal |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms Murphy |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | John Spence & Associates |
ORDERS
The wife’s father and mother MR F and MS O are joined as Second Respondents.
Within one (1) month of the date of this Order the parties are to do all such acts and things necessary to obtain a valuation of the wife’s estate in remainder as tenant in common in equal shares with MS N of Property G in the Parish of (omitted) being the whole of the land in Folio Identifier (omitted) situate at and known as Property G in the State of New South Wales.
The parties are to do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as shall be necessary to instruct (omitted) Pty Ltd to prepare the valuation referred to in the immediately preceding Order and pay the costs of such valuation in equal shares within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Allen & Allen is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 709 of 2015
| MR ALLEN |
Applicant
And
| MS ALLEN |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application in a Case
This is an Application by the husband, who is the Respondent to the substantive Application, for orders providing that the wife, the substantive Applicant, do all that is necessary to arrange for a valuation of a property at Property G by a valuation company known as (omitted) Pty Ltd. He claims, through an affidavit sworn by his solicitor (omitted) on 22 December 2015, that the wife will not consent to the property being valued for the purpose of the property proceedings.
The wife opposes the Application and seeks that it should be dismissed. She asserts that:
a)the property is owned and occupied by her elderly parents, who are in poor health;
b)she only has a remainder interest in the property;
c)she acquired her interest in the property after the parties separated;…
Continue reading ALLEN & ALLEN
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Allen and Allen [2016] FCCA 163
- Case
- [2016] FCCA 163
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before Judge Scarlett was whether the wife's estate in remainder constituted a financial resource to be considered under section 75(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) when determining property settlement. A secondary issue arose concerning the admissibility of evidence relating to discussions at a conciliation conference, which had been included in an affidavit.
Judge Scarlett determined that the estate in remainder was a financial resource to be taken into account under section 75(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), notwithstanding the husband's lack of contribution to its acquisition. The court also ruled that evidence of discussions at a conciliation conference was inadmissible.
The court ordered that the wife's parents be joined as second respondents and that within one month, the parties were to take all necessary steps to obtain a valuation of the wife's estate in remainder. The parties were further ordered to instruct a specified company to prepare the valuation and to pay the costs of this valuation in equal shares within fourteen days of the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The wife’s father and mother MR F and MS O are joined as Second Respondents.
2.
Within one (1) month of the date of this Order the parties are to do all such acts and things necessary to obtain a valuation of the wife’s estate in remainder as tenant in common in equal shares with MS N of Property G in the Parish of (omitted) being the whole of the land in Folio Identifier (omitted) situate at and known as Property G in the State of New South Wales.
3.
The parties are to do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as shall be necessary to instruct (omitted) Pty Ltd to prepare the valuation referred to in the immediately preceding Order and pay the costs of such valuation in equal shares within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.