FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ALLAN & ALLAN AND ORS | [2014] FamCA 250 |
| FAMILY LAW – INJUNCTIONS – where orders were made in 2010 restraining the husband from doing any act in his capacity as protector of the family trust – where the husband sought that injunction be lifted for the purpose of removing the current Trustee of the family trust – where the current trustee of a family trust, Receivers of a second family trust and the wife seek consent orders consistent with a settlement deed executed by them – where consent orders are made prior to the injunction being discharged – where restraint then lifted to enable a new trustee to participate in the continued dispute in relation to the remaining funds |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| Ashton & Ashton (1986) FLC 91-777 Goodwin & Goodwin Alpe (1991) FLC 92-192 |
| APPLICANT: | Mrs Allan |
| 1st RESPONDENT: | Mr Allan |
| 3rd RESPONDENT: | Ms C Allan |
| 4th RESPONDENT: | Mr L Allan |
| 5th RESPONDENT: | Ms H Allan |
| 6th RESPONDENT: | Ms E Allan |
| 12th RESPONDENT: | Mr Senne as trustee for AM Trust |
| 13th RESPONDENT: | Mr Senne |
| INTERVENORS : | Mr D & Mr CP (Receivers) |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 3842 | of | 2008 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 April 2014 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Watts J |
| HEARING DATE: | 13 June 2013 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE WIFE: | Paul & Paul Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE 1ST RESPONDENT: | Mr Green with Ms Oliak |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE 1ST RESPONDENT: | Hudson Law |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE 12TH RESPONDENT: | Delaney Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR INTERVENORS: | Mr Roberts |
| SOLICITOR FOR INTERVENORS: | Kelly & Co Lawyers |
Orders
Order 3 made 17 June 2010 is discharged.
W Nominees No. 2 Pty Limited (Receivers & Managers appointed) (“the Receivers”) cause to be paid out of the account created pursuant to Order numbered 5 of the Orders made on 17 June 2010 (BankSA Investment Cash Account No. …50) (“controlled account”) the sum of $600,000.00 (inclusive of GST) into a controlled monies account (the second controlled account) under the joint control of the wife and Mr Senne as the current trustee for the AM Trust to abide the further order of the Court.
The Receivers be at liberty to have access to and deal with the balance of the funds remaining in the controlled account following the payment contemplated by Order 2 above in accordance with their obligations as Receivers and Managers of W Nominees No. 2 Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation).
The Receivers be relieved from the undertaking referred to in paragraph 1 of the Orders of this Court dated 4 November 2010 and that they be at liberty to sell the items identified in paragraph 9 of the affidavit of Mr Senne sworn on 2 November 2010 and filed in these proceedings and retain the proceeds of that sale or sales.
Subject to orders 2 to 4 made this day, order 4 made 17 June 2010 is discharged.
This matter…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Allan and Allan and Ors and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FamCA 250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate disposition of funds held in a controlled account, particularly the release of $600,000 to a new controlled account pending further order, and to clarify the powers of receivers over the remaining balance. Additionally, the court considered the discharge of prior orders and the liberty of the receivers to sell certain assets and retain the proceeds.
Watts J ordered the discharge of specific previous orders, including Order 3 made on 17 June 2010. A key directive was for the Receivers to pay $600,000 from the existing controlled account into a new controlled account, to be held jointly by the wife and the current trustee for the AM Trust, awaiting further court directions. The Receivers were granted liberty to access and deal with the remaining funds in the original account in accordance with their duties. Furthermore, the Receivers were relieved from an undertaking given on 4 November 2010 and permitted to sell specified items, retaining the proceeds. The matter was relisted for further consideration, with directions for parties seeking orders regarding the $600,000 fund to submit minutes and explanations.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Order 3 made 17 June 2010 is discharged.
2.
W Nominees No. 2 Pty Limited (Receivers & Managers appointed) (“the Receivers”) cause to be paid out of the account created pursuant to Order numbered 5 of the Orders made on 17 June 2010 (BankSA Investment Cash Account No. …50) (“controlled account”) the sum of $600,000.00 (inclusive of GST) into a controlled monies account (the second controlled account) under the joint control of the wife and Mr Senne as the current trustee for the AM Trust to abide the further order of the Court.
3.
The Receivers be at liberty to have access to and deal with the balance of the funds remaining in the controlled account following the payment contemplated by Order 2 above in accordance with their obligations as Receivers and Managers of W Nominees No. 2 Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation).
4.
The Receivers be relieved from the undertaking referred to in paragraph 1 of the Orders of this Court dated 4 November 2010 and that they be at liberty to sell the items identified in paragraph 9 of the affidavit of Mr Senne sworn on 2 November 2010 and filed in these proceedings and retain the proceeds of that sale or sales.
5.
Subject to orders 2 to 4 made this day, order 4 made 17 June 2010 is discharged.
6.
This matter be relisted before myself on 29 May 2014 at 10am.
7.
By 2 May 2014 any party to these proceedings who wishes to seek an order in respect of the amount of $600,000 or part of it in the second controlled account, should forward to my associate a minute setting out what orders they seek in relation to the fund together with a short explanation as to the basis upon which that order is sought and a minute of any other consequential orders that are still sought.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.