Ali v Chandler Macleod Agency

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

ALI

v

CHANDLER MACLEOD AGENCY & ANOR
 [2017] HCASL 328
P59/2017

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to file the application for special leave to appeal.  There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia.  It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought.  Special leave should be refused.     

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M. Bell
14 December 2017

S.J. Gageler
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Ali v Chandler Macleod Agency and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCASL 328
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ali v Chandler Macleod Agency is a case where the applicant sought an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal. The application was made before the High Court of Australia. The respondents in the case are Chandler Macleod Agency and another party, presumably an individual or another entity involved in the proceedings.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file the application for special leave to appeal. The applicant argued that there were circumstances justifying the extension, but the court had to assess the merits of these claims against the need for timely proceedings and the futility of the proposed appeal.

The court found that there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia, which was the lower court that had previously heard the matter. Given this, the court determined that granting the extension would be futile, as the appeal would likely be unsuccessful. The court therefore decided to refuse the application for special leave to appeal. As a result, the High Court dismissed the application, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order to this effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.