Aldi Stores v Kaldi Coffee Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2008] ATMO 29
•30 April 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Aldi Stores v Kaldi Coffee Pty Ltd [2008] ATMO 29
[2008] ATMO 29
30 April 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Aldi Stores Pty Ltd (the opponent) opposed the registration of a trade mark by Kaldi Coffee Pty Ltd (the applicant). The dispute concerned whether the applicant's trade mark should be registered. The decision was made by Iain Thompson, a Hearing Officer at Trade Marks Hearings.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was to determine whether any of the grounds on which the opposition was based had been established, pursuant to section 55 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). This section mandates that the Registrar must decide to refuse or register a trade mark, with or without conditions, having regard to the extent to which any ground of opposition has been established.
The Hearing Officer found that the opponent had not established its opposition on any of the grounds pressed at the hearing, specifically noting that the section 60 ground was not established. Consequently, the Hearing Officer decided that the opposed trade mark could proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Hearing Officer also awarded costs against the opponent, applying the general rule that costs follow the event.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was to determine whether any of the grounds on which the opposition was based had been established, pursuant to section 55 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). This section mandates that the Registrar must decide to refuse or register a trade mark, with or without conditions, having regard to the extent to which any ground of opposition has been established.
The Hearing Officer found that the opponent had not established its opposition on any of the grounds pressed at the hearing, specifically noting that the section 60 ground was not established. Consequently, the Hearing Officer decided that the opposed trade mark could proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Hearing Officer also awarded costs against the opponent, applying the general rule that costs follow the event.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
SingTel Optus Pty Limited v Optum, Inc [2016] ATMO 11
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663