ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership) T/A Aldi Stores

Case [2015] FWCA 4363


[2015] FWCA 4363
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership) T/A Aldi Stores
(AG2015/1077)

ALDI BRENDALE AGREEMENT 2015

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 29 JUNE 2015

Application for approval of the ALDI Brendale Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ALDI Brendale Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. The Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA) was a union bargaining representative involved in the agreement making process.

[2] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) wrote to the applicant, the applicant’s legal representative - Ms McNaughton, and the SDA on 23 June 2015 with respect to the nominal expiry date and the consultation term of the Agreement.

[3] Correspondence was received from Ms McNaughton on 26 June 2015.

Nominal Expiry Date

[4] The nominal expiry date of the Agreement specified at cl. 4 of the Agreement is 4 years after the date of commencement of the Agreement. Pursuant to s.186(5) of the Act, the nominal expiry date of an agreement must not be more than 4 years from the date of approval.

Undertaking

[5] At the request of the Commission, the applicant has provided an undertaking amending the nominal expiry date to be 4 years from the date of approval.

Consultation Term

[6] With respect to the consultation term contained in cl.31 of the Agreement- Consultation, the Commission noted to the applicant the criteria to be satisfied under s.205 of the Act, and that in particular the requirement for a consultation term which requires the employer to consult employees with regard to a change of employees regular roster or ordinary hours of work.

Undertaking

[7] The applicant has provided an undertaking which inserts the required consultation provision of the employer’s obligation to consult employees with regard to a change of an employee’s regular roster or ordinary hours of work. The undertaking satisfies the criteria as per s.205 of the Act.

[8] The undertakings are not so substantial that if asked to vote again the employees who voted would not approve the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the undertakings do not result in a substantial change to the Agreement as per s.190(3)(b) of the Act.

[9] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10] The SDA being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it and supports the approval of the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this employee organisation.

[11] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54(1), the Agreement will operate from 6 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 years from the date of approval.

[12] This decision and undertakings should be brought to the attention of employees covered by the Agreement by the applicant.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE414542  PR568841>

Details
AGLC
ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership) T/A Aldi Stores [2015] FWCA 4363
Case
[2015] FWCA 4363
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership) trading as Aldi Stores, the court was presented with an application for the approval of the ALDI Brendale Agreement 2015. The dispute involved the terms of employment for employees of the applicant company who worked at a specific store in Brendale, Queensland. The Fair Work Commission was the judicial body tasked with considering and ruling on the application.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the terms of the proposed agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, including pay and conditions, and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement would result in employees being treated more favourably or less favourably than they would be under a directly applicable modern award or other industrial instrument.

The Fair Work Commission concluded that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the requirements for approval. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement would not result in employees being treated less favourably than they would be under the applicable modern award. Consequently, the application for approval of the ALDI Brendale Agreement 2015 was granted.

As a result of the Commission's decision, the ALDI Brendale Agreement 2015 was approved and will apply to the employees of ALDI Foods Pty Limited working at the Brendale store. This decision ensures that the terms of employment for these employees are governed by the agreed-upon terms rather than the directly applicable modern award or other industrial instrument.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.