[2013] FWCA 8317 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Alcoa of Australia
(AG2013/10775)
ALCOA WORLD ALUMINA AUSTRALIA, WA OPERATIONS (CEPU ELECTRICAL TRADES) AGREEMENT, 2013
Aluminium industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 24 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Alcoa World Alumina Australia, WA Operations (CEPU Electrical Trades) Agreement, 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Alcoa World Alumina Australia, WA Operations (CEPU Electrical Trades) Agreement, 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Alcoa of Australia. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 September 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404945 PR543665>
- AGLC
- Alcoa of Australia [2013] FWCA 8317
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8317
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the agreement met all the statutory requirements for approval. The agreement was made between the employer and employees covered by a certified enterprise agreement, and it contained provisions on a range of matters including wages and conditions of employment. The court also found that the agreement had been appropriately negotiated, despite the employer's objections. The court held that there was no requirement for the agreement to be approved by a majority of employees, as long as it had been made in good faith and was a genuine enterprise agreement. The court rejected the employer's argument that the agreement was not a genuine enterprise agreement because it had not been approved by a majority of employees.
The court approved the agreement and made an order for its registration. The court found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and met all the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The court also found that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and did not require majority approval by employees. The order of the court was that the agreement be registered as a certified enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.